On Dec 3,2009, at 3:38 AM, andrea wrote:
I don't think that at the moment org-mode can be more than solitary
habit. The "problem" is that org-mode runs on emacs, and really a
small percentage of people can/want to use emacs.
If I ever will be able to work with emacs-(ab)users org-mode can be
really great to centralize documentation/agenda and everything we
could think of.
But to communicate with "normal" people the only way that I see is
some sort of program which understands org-files but don't let the
user do nasty things.
I'm not sure that emacs (ab)use is the right frame of reference here.
Shouldn't we be talking about interoperability standards here? Orgmode
supports the same core set of data that other todo list tools and
calendar tools support. In many cases, Orgmode can export cleanly, as
the OP suggested. In a few cases, it can import. Can that be taken
further? I just wanted to add my two cents for OM "playing well with
others" and I'm curious as to what people are trying.
-- Michael
Michael C. Gilbert -- m...@gilbert.org
The Gilbert Center -- http://gilbert.org
Nonprofit Online News -- http://nonprofitnews.org
"There can be no joy of life without joy of work." -- Aquinas
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
