[Orgmode] Re: Integration of Org mode and mairix

2007-08-16 Thread Steven Lumos
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Aug 15, 2007, at 0:54, Steven Lumos wrote: > >> I have not been following very closely, so sorry if this is redundant. >> I currently use mairix through org-follow-mhe-link, although I had to >> do a little hacking to make MH-E do a search by message

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Integration of Org mode and mairix

2007-08-15 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Aug 15, 2007, at 0:54, Steven Lumos wrote: I have not been following very closely, so sorry if this is redundant. I currently use mairix through org-follow-mhe-link, although I had to do a little hacking to make MH-E do a search by message-id. Interesting, maybe you would like to share you

[Orgmode] Re: Integration of Org mode and mairix

2007-08-14 Thread Steven Lumos
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Aug 7, 2007, at 19:54, Bastien wrote: >> Here is a patch against latest org-mode 5.04 as a first attempt of >> implementing custom link-types (stored in `org-link-custom-types'.) >> >> >> It lets you define an alist of custom link-types. See the doc

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Integration of Org mode and mairix

2007-08-04 Thread Xiao-Yong Jin
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe we could use something like `org-custom-link-types' to do the > trick: its need to know about new link-types, major modes where they > come into play and what function `org-open-at-point' calls for them. > > For example : > > (setq org-custom-link-types

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Integration of Org mode and mairix

2007-07-30 Thread Bastien
Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd prefer to use tracker¹, as it is one component of the GNU desktop > -- Gnome. There are just so many random email indexing tools. If we > want to pick one, Tracker is a good choice. Okay. Now it seems better to me not to integrate any exotic external tool dir

[Orgmode] Re: Integration of Org mode and mairix

2007-07-30 Thread Leo
On 2007-07-30 17:02 +0100, Bastien wrote: > "Georg C. F. Greve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Do you think there is any chance it would make it into the Org >> package? I would greatly prefer not having to maintain a patch for a >> longer period of time. > > I can understand that. Carsten, what