Hello,
Sorry I wasn't around, but I think the 's might be ok if we also
had a class for them or id to be able to style each one differently.
Cheers,
Cezar
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emac
Hi Cezar,
I am not sure if this is intended as being the answer on my request,
but it seems to be not. What I would need to change this
is an agreed position between the people discussing here,
telling me exactly what I am not doing right yet in exporting
headlines and sections into HTML, if the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Also a div should be optional for those who need it, so the whole
> category can be wraped in a like this:
>
>
>
>
> Header here
>
>
> normal text
>
>
> some more text
>
>
>
>
>
> Header here
>
>
> normal text
>
>
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have no opinion and no knowledge to decide this question - please
> work it out among yourselves and tell me what needs to be done.
>
> Thanks.
>
>>> How would that work without divs? The problem is (I think) that
>>> sometimes an org section is rep
"William Henney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The trouble is, it is currently not possible to wrap a section in a
> when you _do_ need it. At least, I tried to do this with @
> ... @ and it produces incorrectly nested tags for the case when
> an org heading is mapped onto an html list item (e.
Mike Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 11:25:00 +0300
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I have not yet used this feature, but I am working with html/css all
>> day, so here is my opinion:
>>
>> 1. You shouldn't use more divs than you need to, and you don't need
>> them.
>>
>
On 10/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I had wondered if there was any value in wrapping the html export in
> > sections to match the structure of the org file.
> >
[ snip ]
> I have not yet used this feature, but I am working wi
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 11:25:00 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have not yet used this feature, but I am working with html/css all
> day, so here is my opinion:
>
> 1. You shouldn't use more divs than you need to, and you don't need
> them.
>
Why (I'm sure there's a good reason)?
> 2. You shoul
Mike Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had wondered if there was any value in wrapping the html export in
> sections to match the structure of the org file.
>
> For example, rather than:
>
> 1 Heading
> Text
>
> 1.1 Subheading
> More text
>
> 1.2 Further subheading
> Still more text
>
>
