Carsten Dominik writes:
> Can I ask you to sign the FSF papers for future patches which might be
> more than a few lines?
I've assigned all past and future changes to Emacs to the FSF already.
That happened a few computers ago, so I don't have that email at hand,
but I think I have a backup some
On Mar 24, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Magnus Henoch wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
this looks like an OK patch and I don't have any problems applying
it.
However, I do not quite understand the need for it. Can you please
try to explain a bit better? Do you have two processes running over
the same
Carsten Dominik writes:
> this looks like an OK patch and I don't have any problems applying it.
> However, I do not quite understand the need for it. Can you please
> try to explain a bit better? Do you have two processes running over
> the same file at the same time, or why is there a conflic
