Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > this looks like an OK patch and I don't have any problems applying it. > However, I do not quite understand the need for it. Can you please > try to explain a bit better? Do you have two processes running over > the same file at the same time, or why is there a conflict?
My dblock-write function calls url-retrieve, to asynchronously retrieve an HTML page. The callback function I pass to url-retrieve will then fill in the information I need into the dynamic block. So in the following case: * Find start of dblock 1, store as pos * Make HTTP request for dblock 1 * Go back to pos * Find end of dblock 1 * Find start of dblock 2, store as pos * Make HTTP request for dblock 2 * Asynchronous event: HTTP response for dblock 1 arrives, insert lots of data in dblock 1 * Go back to pos * Find end of dblock 2 the last step will actually find the end of dblock 1, if the amount of data inserted in dblock 1 is great enough that pos suddenly points inside it. (Then it will of course find dblock 2 again, request its HTML page again, and thus insert the data twice.) An equivalent fix would be to make pos a marker instead. -- Magnus Henoch _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
