Bastien wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Nick Dokos writes:
>
>> AFAICT this has *not* been fixed:
>
> Yes, you're right - the issue I fixed was just a small step forward.
>
> Robert, I applied your patch, thanks a lot for it.
>
> I renamed it to `org-save-frame-excursion' and I slightly modified the
>
Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos writes:
> AFAICT this has *not* been fixed:
Yes, you're right - the issue I fixed was just a small step forward.
Robert, I applied your patch, thanks a lot for it.
I renamed it to `org-save-frame-excursion' and I slightly modified the
docstring, hope you don't mind. I wi
Bastien wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Robert Goldman writes:
>
> > The closest I can do is to set calendar-setup to 'two-frame, which
> > does pop up a frame and leave my cursor trapped in it, but it actually
> > behaves even /worse/ than Aquamacs, because I can't assign a date at
> > all.
>
> Yes,
Hi Robert,
Robert Goldman writes:
> The closest I can do is to set calendar-setup to 'two-frame, which
> does pop up a frame and leave my cursor trapped in it, but it actually
> behaves even /worse/ than Aquamacs, because I can't assign a date at
> all.
Yes, this is a bug - fixed. Let me know
Bastien wrote:
> Robert Goldman writes:
>
>> I will see if I can set up a test case, involving creating some frames,
>> that might display this problem on vanilla Emacs. I'm afraid it's not a
>> very high priority for me, since it will involve getting Org working on
>> a different machine.
>
>
Robert Goldman writes:
> I will see if I can set up a test case, involving creating some frames,
> that might display this problem on vanilla Emacs. I'm afraid it's not a
> very high priority for me, since it will involve getting Org working on
> a different machine.
Thanks for this. I will al
Bastien wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Robert Goldman writes:
>
>> If you are inclined, you should be able to run with this patch, and it
>> should do /absolutely nothing/. That would be a good test, too. If you
>> plug it in, and you use only a single frame, org-mode should not change
>> at all for
Hi Robert,
Robert Goldman writes:
> If you are inclined, you should be able to run with this patch, and it
> should do /absolutely nothing/. That would be a good test, too. If you
> plug it in, and you use only a single frame, org-mode should not change
> at all for you. If it does, you have
Bastien wrote:
> Robert Goldman writes:
>
>> Bastien wrote:
>>> Yes, would be nice if the Aquamacs crowd could test this!
>>>
>>> Thanks Robert for the patch.
>> Actually, let me clarify -- it's even more important for the
>> NON-Aquamacs crowd to test this. I am pretty confident it does The
>>
Robert Goldman writes:
> Bastien wrote:
>> Yes, would be nice if the Aquamacs crowd could test this!
>>
>> Thanks Robert for the patch.
>
> Actually, let me clarify -- it's even more important for the
> NON-Aquamacs crowd to test this. I am pretty confident it does The
> Right Thing on Aquamacs
Bastien wrote:
> Yes, would be nice if the Aquamacs crowd could test this!
>
> Thanks Robert for the patch.
Actually, let me clarify -- it's even more important for the
NON-Aquamacs crowd to test this. I am pretty confident it does The
Right Thing on Aquamacs, but aquamacs uses frames much more
Yes, would be nice if the Aquamacs crowd could test this!
Thanks Robert for the patch.
Robert Goldman writes:
> In an earlier posting, I mentioned that I had a problem with org-mode on
> aquamacs; the cursor (really input focus) was getting "trapped" in a
> different frame when the *Calendar* b
In an earlier posting, I mentioned that I had a problem with org-mode on
aquamacs; the cursor (really input focus) was getting "trapped" in a
different frame when the *Calendar* buffer was not in the same frame as
the source of the org-schedule command (either an org-mode buffer or a
remember buffe
13 matches
Mail list logo
