Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> writes: > I will see if I can set up a test case, involving creating some frames, > that might display this problem on vanilla Emacs. I'm afraid it's not a > very high priority for me, since it will involve getting Org working on > a different machine.
Thanks for this. I will also try to reproduce the problem on vanilla Emacs -- btw, can you suggest a simple recipe on how to reproduce it with emacs -Q (and relevant frame config, of course)? > However, I'm inclined to suggest that, if this is NOT a problem on > vanilla emacs, and my patch does not /damage/ operations on vanilla > emacs while making life easier on aquamacs, we can safely push it. If this is a bug in Aquamacs, we shouldn't fix it in Emacs, even if the workaround doesn't break anything -- by using such a workaround we just remove incentives for Aquamacs people to fix the bug. Anyway, perhaps it's an Emacs + Org problem, so let's test and see! PS: Remember I'm just a temporary maintainer, so I'm just double-careful about not introducing unnecessary changes... -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
