On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 12:42:41 -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
>
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>
> > I am looking for a way out which will allow pdf compilation of Org
> > work out of the box, and still allow texi2dvi to be used where possible.
[...]
> Alternatively, the texi2dvi method can be reverted:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 9:05 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:42 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
I am looking for a way out which will allow pdf compilation of Org
work out of the box, and still allow texi2dvi to b
On Oct 9, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:42 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
I am looking for a way out which will allow pdf compilation of Org
work out of the box, and still allow texi2dvi to be used where
possible.
I have so far come up with
On Oct 9, 2010, at 6:42 AM, Nick Dokos wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
I am looking for a way out which will allow pdf compilation of Org
work out of the box, and still allow texi2dvi to be used where
possible.
I have so far come up with two possible work-arounds and would
like to hear if
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> I am looking for a way out which will allow pdf compilation of Org
> work out of the box, and still allow texi2dvi to be used where possible.
>
> I have so far come up with two possible work-arounds and would
> like to hear if one of them makes sense:
>
> 1. I could s
Oh dear. As the person who originally suggested using texi2dvi, I feel a
little bit responsible for all the trouble it has caused. I wouldn't have
thought that such a widely used script would have a bug like this.
Anyway, one option would be to include a patched version of texi2dvi in the
org di
On Oct 9, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:06:24 -0700, suvayu ali > wrote:
[...]
I have filed a bug report on the Fedora bugzilla[1] pointing to all
the relevant discussions about this issue. Feel free to add to/edit
it. Thanks everyone for narrowing this down. :
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:06:24 -0700, suvayu ali
wrote:
[...]
> I have filed a bug report on the Fedora bugzilla[1] pointing to all
> the relevant discussions about this issue. Feel free to add to/edit
> it. Thanks everyone for narrowing this down. :)
And this bug has already been reported (twice
Hi everyone,
On 8 October 2010 11:51, Nick Dokos wrote:
> FYI: Karl Berry's reply - afaict, it does not solve everything ( the
> regexp might mean different things in different locales), but is it
> good enough for its limited purpose (detecting drive letters)?
>
I have filed a bug report on the
FYI: Karl Berry's reply - afaict, it does not solve everything ( the
regexp might mean different things in different locales), but is it
good enough for its limited purpose (detecting drive letters)?
Nick
--- Forwarded Message
Date:Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:38:00 +
From:k...@freefriend
10 matches
Mail list logo
