On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 12:42:41 -0400, Nick Dokos <nicholas.do...@hp.com> wrote:
> 
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > I am looking for a way out which will allow pdf compilation of Org
> > work out of the box, and still allow texi2dvi to be used where possible.

[...]

> Alternatively, the texi2dvi method can be reverted: it was an idea that
> was worth trying, but it has caused more harm than good at this point
> - maybe it can be revisited in six months.
> 
> > Any ather ideas?  Comments?
> > 
> 
> Nick

I would vote this way.  I like texi2dvi but maybe keep to pdflatex++
for now?  Anybody who wishes to use texi2dvi (as I would right now on
those systems where I have fixed the texi2dvi script) can easily do
so but those not aware of the problems won't be caught out.
-- 
Eric S Fraga
GnuPG: 8F5C 279D 3907 E14A 5C29  570D C891 93D8 FFFC F67D
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Reply via email to