Hi Samuel,
Samuel Wales writes:
> But I think it makes sense to make the settings orthogonal as they are
> unrelated features.
Okay, thanks.
--
Bastien
Hi Bastien,
On 1/3/13, Bastien wrote:
> Do I understand right that you would like to display indirect
> buffers in a new frame and follow agenda trees in other window?
> And that you are forced to chose between the two right now?
Yes. C-c C-x b in new frame; agenda follow in other window.
Plea
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Wales writes:
> In my case, follow-mode works best with a split window.
>
> So combining them makes me choose which to not use.
Do I understand right that you would like to display indirect
buffers in a new frame and follow agenda trees in other window?
And that you are forced
On 1/2/13, Nick Dokos wrote:
>> That's excellent for manual creation of a new frame. However, it also
>> creates a new frame with (setq org-agenda-follow-indirect t).
>>
>> Is this intended?
>>
>
> It would seem so: org-agenda-follow-indirect is used in a single place:
In my case, follow-mode wo
Samuel Wales wrote:
> ===
> org-indirect-buffer-display is a variable defined in `org.el'.
> Its value is new-frame
> Original value was other-window
>
> Documentation:
> How should indirect tree buffers be displayed?
> This applies to indirect buffers created with the commands
> M-x org-tree-to
