Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> wrote: > === > org-indirect-buffer-display is a variable defined in `org.el'. > Its value is new-frame > Original value was other-window > > Documentation: > How should indirect tree buffers be displayed? > This applies to indirect buffers created with the commands > M-x org-tree-to-indirect-buffer and M-x org-agenda-tree-to-indirect-buffer. > ... > === > > That's excellent for manual creation of a new frame. However, it also > creates a new frame with (setq org-agenda-follow-indirect t). > > Is this intended? >
It would seem so: org-agenda-follow-indirect is used in a single place: ,---- | (defun org-agenda-do-context-action () | "Show outline path and, maybe, follow mode window." | (let ((m (org-get-at-bol 'org-marker))) | (when (and (markerp m) (marker-buffer m)) | (and org-agenda-follow-mode | (if org-agenda-follow-indirect | (org-agenda-tree-to-indirect-buffer nil) | (org-agenda-show))) | (and org-agenda-show-outline-path | (org-with-point-at m (org-display-outline-path t)))))) `---- If it is not nil, org-agenda-tree-to-indirect-buffer is called, so this case falls under the spell of org-indirect-buffer-display. Nick > Thanks. > > Samuel > > -- > The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com > > The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. ANYBODY > can get it. There is no hope without action. >
