Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-07 Thread Dieter Wilhelm
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Dieter Wilhelm writes: > >> Thank you very much, practically to the same time Nicolas G. pointed >> this out as well and I had some issues with the html-preamble, so I >> didn't reply. But as an aside: Is there a place in worg, in the >> documentation, a lisp file wher

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-07 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > It is set to `auto'. I thought the #+options: postamble:t line would > change this. I was caught by this too. IIRC, it's #+options: html-postamble:t Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-07 Thread Alan Schmitt
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > It isn't the date but the document time stamp (see > `org-export-time-stamp-file'). I see, sorry for the confusion. >> But there is something weird, in the default option: >> >> (("en" "Author: %a (%e)\nDate: >> %d\nGenerated by %c\n> class=\"xhtml-validation\">%v")) >

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-07 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Dieter Wilhelm writes: > Thank you very much, practically to the same time Nicolas G. pointed > this out as well and I had some issues with the html-preamble, so I > didn't reply. But as an aside: Is there a place in worg, in the > documentation, a lisp file where these wonderful macros are to b

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-07 Thread Dieter Wilhelm
Rick Frankel writes: > On 04.04.2013 17:36, Dieter Wilhelm wrote: >> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >>> Alan Schmitt writes: >>> Dieter Wilhelm writes: but now I can't specify a date in the form > > #+DATE: "%Y-%m-%d" > > Formerly an empty specification meant the curren

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-06 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Alan Schmitt writes: > Here is the postamble that is generated here: > > > Author: Me > Created: 2013-04-06 Sat 19:25 > Generated by http://orgmode.org";>Org mode > 8.0-pre in http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/";>Emacs > 24.2.93.1. > href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer";>Validate

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-06 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hello, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I cannot reproduce your problem. > > With the current Org buffer: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > #+language: en > #+author: Me > #+options: postamble:t author:t date:t > * Headline > Body > --8<---cut here

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-06 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > Ah, I see. What I don't understand is why the default postamble can > display the date, as it's also using %d: > > Original value was > (("en" "Author: %a (%e)\nDate: > %d\nGenerated by %c\n class=\"xhtml-validation\">%v")) I cannot reproduce your problem. With

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-06 Thread Alan Schmitt
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Alan Schmitt writes: > >> I have a more serious issue: it seems that '%d' is no longer taken into >> account. To reproduce, try exporting the following: >> >> #+BEGIN_SRC org >> # -*- org-export-allow-bind-keywords: t -*- >> >> #+TITLE: Testing the date >> #+B

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-06 Thread Maurice
Nicolas Goaziou écrivit : > I have pushed a fix in master branch. Does it solves the problem? It solves, Maurice should practice writing in English to submit the first.

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-06 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, > #+DATE: {{{modification-time(%Y-%m-%d)}}} > > is working when I'm exporting individual files but now when I'm trying > to publish I'm getting: > > Generating tree-style sitemap for Die Dünenhof-Seite [15 times] > byte-code: Bad timestamp `((macro (:key modification-time :value > {{{modif

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-06 Thread Dieter Wilhelm
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > >> Sorry I don't get it completely. >> I'd like to have as the DATE value the current change time of the file. >> You mean that I should set this with the Emacs timestamp facility? Like: > >> #+DATE: Time-stamp: " " > > If you're exporting a buffer associated

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-05 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > I have a more serious issue: it seems that '%d' is no longer taken into > account. To reproduce, try exporting the following: > > #+BEGIN_SRC org > # -*- org-export-allow-bind-keywords: t -*- > > #+TITLE: Testing the date > #+BIND: org-html-postamble-format (("en" "

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-05 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, > Sorry I don't get it completely. > I'd like to have as the DATE value the current change time of the file. > You mean that I should set this with the Emacs timestamp facility? Like: > #+DATE: Time-stamp: " " If you're exporting a buffer associated to a file, you may use: #+DATE: {{

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-05 Thread Rick Frankel
On 04.04.2013 17:36, Dieter Wilhelm wrote: Nicolas Goaziou writes: Alan Schmitt writes: Dieter Wilhelm writes: but now I can't specify a date in the form #+DATE: "%Y-%m-%d" Formerly an empty specification meant the current date, but now in the preamble the date remains empty. I'm ha

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-05 Thread Rick Frankel
On 05.04.2013 03:17, Alan Schmitt wrote: I have a more serious issue: it seems that '%d' is no longer taken into account. To reproduce, try exporting the following: #+BEGIN_SRC org # -*- org-export-allow-bind-keywords: t -*- #+TITLE: Testing the date #+BIND: org-html-postamble-format (("en" "T

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-05 Thread Alan Schmitt
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I didn't try to reproduce the problem, but specifying a format time > string as a DATE value is not possible anymore. You still can provide > a timestamp and tweak `org-export-date-timestamp-format' (or BIND it) to > format it. I have a more serious issue: it seems that

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-04 Thread Dieter Wilhelm
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Alan Schmitt writes: > >> Dieter Wilhelm writes: >> >>> Dear list, >>> >>> I changed the html postamble >>> >>> org-html-postamble-format is a variable defined in `ox-html.el'. >>> Its value is >>> (("en" "Author: %a (%e)\nDate: %d >>> \nGenerated by %c \n")

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-03 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > Dieter Wilhelm writes: > >> Dear list, >> >> I changed the html postamble >> >> org-html-postamble-format is a variable defined in `ox-html.el'. >> Its value is >> (("en" "Author: %a (%e)\nDate: %d >> \nGenerated by %c \n") >> ("de" "Autor: %a (%e)\nDatum: %d >>

Re: [O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-04-03 Thread Alan Schmitt
Dieter Wilhelm writes: > Dear list, > > I changed the html postamble > > org-html-postamble-format is a variable defined in `ox-html.el'. > Its value is > (("en" "Author: %a (%e)\nDate: %d > \nGenerated by %c \n") > ("de" "Autor: %a (%e)\nDatum: %d > \nGeneriert von %c \n") > ("fr" "Auteur: %a

[O] org-html-postamble-format and #+DATE: specification in 8.0pre

2013-03-29 Thread Dieter Wilhelm
Dear list, I changed the html postamble org-html-postamble-format is a variable defined in `ox-html.el'. Its value is (("en" "Author: %a (%e)\nDate: %d \nGenerated by %c \n") ("de" "Autor: %a (%e)\nDatum: %d \nGeneriert von %c \n") ("fr" "Auteur: %a (%e)\nDate: %d \nGenerated by %c \n")) Or