Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Therefore, I don't see any reason to keep maintaining the #+SETUP_FILE
> keyword. I'd rather remove it and suggest to use #+INCLUDE: keyword
> instead.
>
> Any objection?
FWIW, none on my side.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
Hello Nicolas,
François Pinard wrote:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> Therefore, I don't see any reason to keep maintaining the #+SETUP_FILE
>> keyword. I'd rather remove it and suggest to use #+INCLUDE: keyword
>> instead. Any objection?
>
> None really. I use both and distinguish them in some
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Therefore, I don't see any reason to keep maintaining the #+SETUP_FILE
> keyword. I'd rather remove it and suggest to use #+INCLUDE: keyword
> instead. Any objection?
None really. I use both and distinguish them in some validation tool,
which I would happily and easil
Hello,
I'd like to remove #+SETUP_FILE (that is #+SETUPFILE in the old
exporter) from the new exporter.
The reasoning behind this is that #+INCLUDE already provides a similar
feature (and some others). I.e. you can almost always do:
#+INCLUDE: "my-setup.org"
instead of
#+SETUP_FILE: "my-setup.
