Hello Nicolas, François Pinard wrote: > Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaz...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Therefore, I don't see any reason to keep maintaining the #+SETUP_FILE >> keyword. I'd rather remove it and suggest to use #+INCLUDE: keyword >> instead. Any objection? > > None really. I use both and distinguish them in some validation tool, > which I would happily and easily adapt! :-)
Fine with me. This makes a lot of sense, when they don't differ that much, and when we don't know exactly which one to use in which context (= my view). Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
