I agree that this is important.
For new features, Extensible Syntax (capitalized because it is a
specific proposal for a concrete universal syntax) allows you to use
the same quoting, escaping, nesting, exporting, etc. solutions that
were arrived at as a one-time fundamental mechanism.
This reduc
Achim Gratz wrote:
> The question really is if org hasn't evolved to the point where it needs
> a more general quoting/escaping mechanism. This might be one of the
> things to ponder during the upcoming exporter cleanup, but goes a bit
> beyond just exporting.
>
Absolutely right - org has grow
Achim Gratz wrote
> The question really is if org hasn't evolved to the point where it needs
> a more general quoting/escaping mechanism.
+1
However there's caveat:
Just run
zgrep '' *.el.gz
on your emacs' el.gz files and you will find that its not empty -- So
general and conven
Sébastien Vauban
writes:
> Hence, questions:
[...]
The question really is if org hasn't evolved to the point where it needs
a more general quoting/escaping mechanism. This might be one of the
things to ponder during the upcoming exporter cleanup, but goes a bit
beyond just exporting.
Achim.
--
