[O] Re: "Tag hierarchy" idea

2011-03-24 Thread John Tait
Thanks Jambunathan K. Your concise summary is correct. As it stands, selective export from Orgmode is already excellent -- combining both #+EXPORT_SELECT_TAGS: and #+EXPORT_EXCLUDE_TAGS: in various ways allows for very precise exporting; this is particularly apparent when dealing with tags at diff

[O] Re: "Tag hierarchy" idea

2011-03-24 Thread Jambunathan K
IIUC, what you are saying is that you would like to define few atomic tags and a few composite tag. A composite tag is presumably a union of some of those atomic tags. You need an ability to selectively export of the items that fall under the composite tag. Orgmode allows selective viewing (and e

[O] Re: "Tag hierarchy" idea

2011-03-22 Thread Matt Lundin
John Tait writes: > Thanks for that. But then what are #-FILETAGS for? > FILETAGS are primarily used in the agenda -- i.e., filetags are inherited by the entire file, so when you filter the agenda by tags, the filetags are also considered. Not much work has been done to integrate filetags with

[O] Re: "Tag hierarchy" idea

2011-03-21 Thread Jambunathan K
> May I propose an additional feature? > We could assign tags to hierarchies of other tags. As a technical editor how do you think you would make use of hierarchical tags. Without getting in to how this feature might be implemented, if you can articulate your particular requirements and your par

[O] Re: "Tag hierarchy" idea

2011-03-21 Thread Matt Lundin
John Tait writes: > > While I am here (sorry), I couldn't get #+FILETAGS: to work in org-version > 7.4. > > For example, if I export a file (to html) File1.org with > "#+EXPORT_EXCLUDE_TAGS: john", and then I include File2.org, I can see > File2.org included as part the export of File1 as expecte