Hi,
Suvayu Ali writes:
> In fact, I'm always of the opinion, if the change is minor, or corrects
> a mistake, or simplifies things, just go ahead with it.
My thoughts exactly -- Rasmus, please go ahead by apply your change
and Suvayu will complete it when he has time.
Thanks both,
--
Bastie
Hi Rasmus, Bastien,
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Rasmus wrote:
>
> I have attached a quick patch with a text that I think is more
> accurate and that tries to explain the issue. I think the tone may be
> too "academic"/dry.
>
> Since Suvayu put the initial effort into the answer I
Bastien writes:
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> Rasmus writes:
>
>>> The only tricky part is to remove the heading from the table
>>> of contents, but this is optional and the limitation can be advertized
>>> as such.
>>
>> Come on, that's not really acceptable for an advice on org-mode.org.
>
> It is better t
Hi Rasmus,
Rasmus writes:
>> The only tricky part is to remove the heading from the table
>> of contents, but this is optional and the limitation can be advertized
>> as such.
>
> Come on, that's not really acceptable for an advice on org-mode.org.
It is better than the current situation.
> To
Bastien writes:
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> Rasmus writes:
>
>> The intention is nice, but this entry is flawed to the point that it
>> should be removed or undergo some heavy editing IMO. . .
>
> Yes, the sa-ignore-headline function should be updated.
>
> Can you give it a go?
In two weeks.
> I don't se
Hi Rasmus,
Rasmus writes:
> The intention is nice, but this entry is flawed to the point that it
> should be removed or undergo some heavy editing IMO. . .
Yes, the sa-ignore-headline function should be updated.
Can you give it a go?
I don't see why this should not be easy: you can simply try
Suvayu Ali writes:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:28:28PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
>> Suvayu Ali writes:
>>
>> > BTW, the ignoreheading thing has been asked so many times, maybe I
>> > should put it in an FAQ. But then, the content is more appropriate for
>> > org-hacks ... I'm unde
Hi Bastien,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 03:28:28PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
> Suvayu Ali writes:
>
> > BTW, the ignoreheading thing has been asked so many times, maybe I
> > should put it in an FAQ. But then, the content is more appropriate for
> > org-hacks ... I'm undecided. Any thoughts?
>
> It's
Hi Suvayu,
Suvayu Ali writes:
> BTW, the ignoreheading thing has been asked so many times, maybe I
> should put it in an FAQ. But then, the content is more appropriate for
> org-hacks ... I'm undecided. Any thoughts?
It's both a FAQ and a hack, perhaps put the answer in the FAQ and the
detail
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:56:35AM +, James Harkins wrote:
> Suvayu Ali gmail.com> writes:
>
> > A couple of comments about formatting: the
> > first two footnotes might be better as links from the text. I propose
> > the attached patch. If you think this is fine, I'll push it.
>
> Sure, g
Suvayu Ali gmail.com> writes:
> A couple of comments about formatting: the
> first two footnotes might be better as links from the text. I propose
> the attached patch. If you think this is fine, I'll push it.
Sure, go ahead.
hjh
Hi James,
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:57:11AM +0800, James Harkins wrote:
>
> http://orgmode.org/worg/exporters/beamer/beamer-dual-format.html
It is a great resource. A couple of comments about formatting: the
first two footnotes might be better as links from the text. I propose
the attached pa
Hi all,
Some weeks ago, I wrote here about a large project (training materials for
the SuperCollider audio/music programming language), written entirely in
org using the Beamer exporter to produce both slideshows and an
article-format book for the students to use as a reference.
I just put a
13 matches
Mail list logo
