Hi Rasmus, Bastien, On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Rasmus wrote: > > I have attached a quick patch with a text that I think is more > accurate and that tries to explain the issue. I think the tone may be > too "academic"/dry. > > Since Suvayu put the initial effort into the answer I will wait for > his approval before submitting it.
Sorry I was a bit sloppy. The origin of the hack is from LaTeX export. I did not test it extensively for other backends. Now I realise why it worked for me; I always export with no toc for html and ascii. and LaTeX takes care of toc. Your patch looks good, however I think the language is indeed too academic and could be simplified and made more accesible. It is Worg after all :). > >> To deal with the tricky part you need an additional filter. Or you > >> need a filter on the final output and you'd probably need to make some > >> accounting of what's present and what is not so that you can update > >> counters and TOCs. > > > > That's why I say it's tricky. > > > > Let's keep this constructive and move forward -- maybe that was not > > your intention, but the tone of your first email was a bit harsh. > > I'm sure Suvayu is open to suggestions on how to improve the filter. > > That was not the intention. For that I appoligize. In fact, I'm always of the opinion, if the change is minor, or corrects a mistake, or simplifies things, just go ahead with it. It is a community resource! I won't have time to work on this any time soon (now I'm at a workshop, review deadline next week, holiday the week after). Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.
