> "SM" == Stefan Monnier writes:
SM> I have no opinion on that part, but if a part of Hydra would be useful for
SM> other packages, then it'd be good to split it out: for me "Hydra" means
SM> "define a Hydra via defhydra or something like that", so if you tell me to
SM> use Hydra to "show the
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Kaushal Modi
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 6:51 PM Robert Weiner wrote:
>
>>
>> One limitation of hydra right now is that it doesn't interface with the
>> standard way of showing help for key bindings since its keys aren't
>> actually bound but handled via i
> (defhydra hydra-zoom ()
> "zoom"
> ("g" text-scale-increase "in")
> ("l" text-scale-decrease "out"))
> (global-set-key (kbd "C-c") 'hydra-zoom/body)
But now this one suffers from other problems:
- `C-h k` does not let me directly find the binding of `C-c g`.
- A `C-c a` binding in a lower
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 1:53 AM John Wiegley wrote:
> Plus, there are other, less intrusive way to achieve "show the available
> valid
> key bindings", such as the which-key package.
>
As I mentioned in a recent response to Stefan in this thread, I did a poor
job with that problem statement.. I
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 6:51 PM Robert Weiner wrote:
>
> One limitation of hydra right now is that it doesn't interface with the
> standard way of showing help for key bindings since its keys aren't
> actually bound but handled via internal hydra event handling. With a bit
> of thought though,
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 4:49 PM Stefan Monnier
wrote:
> I tend to think of Hydra as "bindings that stick around" (to take the
> wording on the first line of hydra.el), rather than "ways to show
> available bindings of the current submap". So, yes, I think it does
> something else (something more
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Stefan Monnier
wrote:
>
> > Can hydra.el be merged into Emacs core, so that all the packages can
> start
> > taking advantage of that?
>
> I have no opinion on that part, but if a part of Hydra would be useful
> for other packages, then it'd be good to split it ou
>> While Hydra might include the feature you're looking for, AFAICT it does
>> something else than what you're looking for.
> I don't follow "it does something else than what you're looking for". hydra
> is used to define interfaces to temporary keymaps with well-formatted hints.
I tend to think o
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 4:05 PM Stefan Monnier
wrote:
> > Problem statement: Need to have a pretty interface that shows the
> available
> > valid key bindings.
> [...]
> > Of all those options and more that I've seen out there, hydra.el looks
> like
> > the most elegant and *configurable* option.
> Problem statement: Need to have a pretty interface that shows the available
> valid key bindings.
[...]
> Of all those options and more that I've seen out there, hydra.el looks like
> the most elegant and *configurable* option.
While Hydra might include the feature you're looking for, AFAICT it
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:47 PM Eric Abrahamsen
wrote:
>
> Okay, interesting. I agree that "discoverable keymaps" and "action
> dispatchers" (whatever Org and Magit do) aren't quite the same thing,
> and it would be nice to have both. I guess in the meantime, though,
> we're still going to have t
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 3:20 PM Eric Abrahamsen
wrote:
>
> Hydra definitely sounds nice, but unless I'm misunderstanding how it
> works, it can't be a replacement for either Org's export interface, or
> Magit's popups. Both of those can set various state variables before
> choosing an actual acti
Kaushal Modi writes:
> Copying this on both Emacs devel and Org mode list. Hopefully this discussion
> is eligible for that.
>
> Problem statement: Need to have a pretty interface that shows the available
> valid key bindings.
>
> We have something custom developed for Org export interface. M
I discovered accidentally some years ago, when I had been using a popup
help function that I cobbled together myself with a hot key, that
-F1 loads a list of bindings under that prefix. It's an awesome
feature of GNU/Emacs.
Alan Davis
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Kaushal Modi
wrote:
> On
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:48 PM Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Tuesday, 12 Dec 2017 at 14:02, Kaushal Modi wrote:
> > Copying this on both Emacs devel and Org mode list. Hopefully this
> > discussion is eligible for that.
> >
> > Problem statement: Need to have a pretty interface that shows the
> avail
On Tuesday, 12 Dec 2017 at 14:02, Kaushal Modi wrote:
> Copying this on both Emacs devel and Org mode list. Hopefully this
> discussion is eligible for that.
>
> Problem statement: Need to have a pretty interface that shows the available
> valid key bindings.
which-key-mode works well for me.
--
Copying this on both Emacs devel and Org mode list. Hopefully this
discussion is eligible for that.
Problem statement: Need to have a pretty interface that shows the available
valid key bindings.
We have something custom developed for Org export interface. Magit has its
own popup interface. I kno
17 matches
Mail list logo
