On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 04:18:08 -0400 Nicolas Goaziou
wrote
> > On Sat, 09 Sep 2017 05:06:24 -0400 James Harkins
> > wrote
> >> I guess next I'm going to try to hack ox-odt.el...
> >
> > Hm, that's going to be too complicated.
>
> I can help you doing so.
Thanks. At
Hello,
James Harkins writes:
> On Sat, 09 Sep 2017 05:06:24 -0400 James Harkins
> wrote
>> I guess next I'm going to try to hack ox-odt.el...
>
> Hm, that's going to be too complicated.
I can help you doing so.
> So I suppose my only other option is to make an SVG for every code
On Sat, 09 Sep 2017 05:06:24 -0400 James Harkins
wrote
> I guess next I'm going to try to hack ox-odt.el...
Hm, that's going to be too complicated. So I suppose my only other option is to
make an SVG for every code example, and include only images. Or hack the xml by
hand in the fi
On Fri, 08 Sep 2017 23:52:33 -0400 James Harkins
wrote
> Is there a way to have "figure" references in ODT exports be simply a flat
> list?
>
> Meaning -- I would like "Example 1," "Example 2," etc. (or "Figure," doesn't
> really matter).
>
> With "num:nil," "Listing 1," "Listi
Hi,
Is there a way to have "figure" references in ODT exports be simply a flat list?
Meaning -- I would like "Example 1," "Example 2," etc. (or "Figure," doesn't
really matter).
With "num:nil," "Listing 1," "Listing 2," "Listing 3," but there is also a
figure, which becomes "Figure 1." So ther
