> Decoupling is not a good idea. Because it will let user define too much
> keybindings. And User can define keybinding in Emacs easily. Emacs is
> powerful for customization.
I disagree. It is against emacs philosophy.
It is one of the key features of emacs that users can redefine
keybindings if
Decoupling is not a good idea. Because it will let user define too much
keybindings. And User can define keybinding in Emacs easily. Emacs is
powerful for customization.
And user need convention for Org default keybindings so that when Org
users communications can know what he did. For example,
On Tuesday, November 27, 2018 12:02 AM, Nicolas Goaziou
wrote:
>
> Are you talking about Org a whole, or just Org agenda? All your examples
> are about the latter. If it's about Org agenda, well, I'm afraid to say
> there are so many things to fix there that keybindings are only the tip
> of the
Hello,
mithraeum writes:
> I'd like to request that org's keybindings be separated from the functions
> they use to do their work.
>
> This would greatly ease the use of these functions by people who want to use
> their own keybindings rather than relying on keybindings that org provides.
>
>
I'd like to request that org's keybindings be separated from the functions they
use to do their work.
This would greatly ease the use of these functions by people who want to use
their own keybindings rather than relying on keybindings that org provides.
The reason I ask is that recently I've b
