> Decoupling is not a good idea. Because it will let user define too much > keybindings. And User can define keybinding in Emacs easily. Emacs is > powerful for customization.
I disagree. It is against emacs philosophy. It is one of the key features of emacs that users can redefine keybindings if they need to (but do not have to do it). I do not like loosing this feature without a strong reason. > And user need convention for Org default keybindings so that when Org > users communications can know what he did. For example, when I said [C-c > C-c] in Org, Every Org users know it. You can as well say `M-x org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c` and be understood. Best, Ihor stardiviner <numbch...@gmail.com> writes: > Decoupling is not a good idea. Because it will let user define too much > keybindings. And User can define keybinding in Emacs easily. Emacs is > powerful for customization. > > And user need convention for Org default keybindings so that when Org > users communications can know what he did. For example, when I said [C-c > C-c] in Org, Every Org users know it. > > -- > [ stardiviner ] > I try to make every word tell the meaning what I want to express. > > Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/ > IRC(freenode): stardiviner, Matrix: stardiviner > GPG: F09F650D7D674819892591401B5DF1C95AE89AC3 >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
