On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:16:25AM +0200, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
> Hello Suvayu,
>
> Suvayu Ali wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:51:33AM +0200, Nicolas Richard wrote:
> >> Carsten Dominik writes:
> >>
> >> > Applied
> >>
> >> I noticed that the whole mail went into the commit msg (commit
Hello Suvayu,
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:51:33AM +0200, Nicolas Richard wrote:
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>> > Applied
>>
>> I noticed that the whole mail went into the commit msg (commit
>> 12de6223dcd736c0958eca874def052b407ff5d1) ; did I send the patch
>> incorrectly ?
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:51:33AM +0200, Nicolas Richard wrote:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
> > Applied
>
> I noticed that the whole mail went into the commit msg (commit
> 12de6223dcd736c0958eca874def052b407ff5d1) ; did I send the patch
> incorrectly ?
>
> I used git format-patch then inserte
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Applied
I noticed that the whole mail went into the commit msg (commit
12de6223dcd736c0958eca874def052b407ff5d1) ; did I send the patch
incorrectly ?
I used git format-patch then inserted the result at the end of the email
I wrote. The page http://orgmode.org/worg/org-
Applied, thanks you Nicolas.
- Carsten
On 16.9.2013, at 15:42, Nicolas Richard wrote:
> I suggest the following change so that C-u C-u C-c ! inserts an inactive
> timestamp. I also document the INACTIVE argument of org-time-stamp.
>
> --
> Nicolas.
>
> From 5cdb18297d92f2d99334d98aa2f3b8a40e
I suggest the following change so that C-u C-u C-c ! inserts an inactive
timestamp. I also document the INACTIVE argument of org-time-stamp.
--
Nicolas.
>From 5cdb18297d92f2d99334d98aa2f3b8a40e44702f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nicolas Richard
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:02:21 +0200
Subject: [