Vladimir Panteleev writes:
> Ah! Well, thanks for the clarification, and apologies for the
> confusion.
Well, thanks for bearing with me.
>> I consider it to be a bug if you need to write $"string" instead of
>> "string" in any `org-sbe' call. We should not test such a mis-feature,
>> which sho
Hi,
On 2018-03-18 22:24, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
We're clearly mis-communicating. I know the difference between a symbol
and a string, and how `read' operates. I think what puzzles me is some
design choices made in `org-sbe', and the fact that the second note of
its docstring is clear as mud.
A
Hello,
Vladimir Panteleev writes:
> On 2018-03-14 15:00, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>> I disagree. You are testing an implementation detail here: the fact that
>> "$" is not necessarily a prefix. According to the docstring, it should
>> be, so the test should use that, too. What if we rewrite `org-
On 2018-03-14 15:00, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev writes:
I wrote about this in the cover letter too. $"foo" and $ "foo" are
both the same thing.
Just to make it clear: I read the cover letter. My confusion doesn't
come from the fact I may not have read it.
In that case, I need
Vladimir Panteleev writes:
> I wrote about this in the cover letter too. $"foo" and $ "foo" are
> both the same thing.
Just to make it clear: I read the cover letter. My confusion doesn't
come from the fact I may not have read it.
> In both cases, they are two distinct lisp tokens.
> The way $
Hi,
On 2018-03-14 13:49, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev writes:
I agree that it is strange. I mentioned it (and its strangeness) in
the cover-letter. The documentation of org-sbe describes it as well.
AFAICT, it doesn't. "org-sbe" describes a dollar _prefix_, but yours
stands on i
Hello,
Vladimir Panteleev writes:
> I agree that it is strange. I mentioned it (and its strangeness) in
> the cover-letter. The documentation of org-sbe describes it as well.
AFAICT, it doesn't. "org-sbe" describes a dollar _prefix_, but yours
stands on its own. It prefixes nothing. Also, it se
Hi,
On 2018-03-12 23:15, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
The dollar character looks strange. What syntax is that?
I agree that it is strange. I mentioned it (and its strangeness) in the
cover-letter. The documentation of org-sbe describes it as well.
+#+name: identity
+#+begin_src emacs-lisp :eval
Hello,
Vladimir Panteleev writes:
> * ob-table.el (org-sbe): (org-sbe func (x $ "a\"b\"c")) did the wrong
The dollar character looks strange. What syntax is that?
> - (quote (format "\"%s\"" el))
> + (quote (format "%S"
* ob-table.el (org-sbe): (org-sbe func (x $ "a\"b\"c")) did the wrong
thing because org-sbe would simply wrap any $-prefixed value in
quotes, without any escaping. Fix this by using "%S" (instead of
"\"%s\"").
* test-ob-table.el: Add test.
---
lisp/ob-table.el | 2 +-
testing/lisp/t
10 matches
Mail list logo
