Thanks!
Yours,
Christian
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Christian Moe writes:
>
>>> For now, I think the patch is correct to apply. What do you think?
>>
>> Absolutely, it fixes a bug in footnote styling, and adds useful styling
>> of quotes within footnotes.
>
> Patch applied. Thank you.
>
>
> Re
Christian Moe writes:
>> For now, I think the patch is correct to apply. What do you think?
>
> Absolutely, it fixes a bug in footnote styling, and adds useful styling
> of quotes within footnotes.
Patch applied. Thank you.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Hi again,
Now that I've finally pointed to the patched file, the patch seems to
work perfectly.
> We could also make use of OrgFootnoteVerse and OrgFootnoteCode styles,
> but I'm not sure about their definition.
It doesn't matter all that much, I think -- in any case the style
definition is ent
Christian Moe writes:
> Apologies, it looks like my installation is to blame, and that the part
> of the patch that inserted the new style definitions was never applied
> to OrgOdtStyles.xml. My org-odt-styles-dir becomes
> "/usr/share/emacs/etc/org/styles/", not "etc/styles/". I assume the
> lat
Hi, Nicolas,
Apologies, it looks like my installation is to blame, and that the part
of the patch that inserted the new style definitions was never applied
to OrgOdtStyles.xml. My org-odt-styles-dir becomes
"/usr/share/emacs/etc/org/styles/", not "etc/styles/". I assume the
latter would be the co
Hello,
Christian Moe writes:
> * The new styles don't seem to get applied
>
> Quote and center blocks in footnotes do not get OrgFootnoteQuotations
> style in my test. They remain Footnote.
>
> (You didn't add any OrgFootnoteVerse style, but I tried it out anyway. A
> verse block inside a footno
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> I understood your problem, but I needed to know how deep I had to change
> paragraph styles.
Pardon the noise.
> Would you mind testing the following patch? I added two new styles. Feel
> free to correct them if needed.
* The patch fixes the announced bug. Thank you!
Hello,
Christian Moe writes:
> Maybe I'm being obtuse, but I don't understand the relevance of your
> question to the bug I pointed out. My example had two simple footnotes,
> neither of which contained any blocks.
I understood your problem, but I needed to know how deep I had to change
paragra
Hi,
Maybe I'm being obtuse, but I don't understand the relevance of your
question to the bug I pointed out. My example had two simple footnotes,
neither of which contained any blocks. The only difference between them
was that one was located inside the subtree being exported and the other
not. Th
Hello,
Christian Moe writes:
> The new ODT exporter sometimes, but not always fails to put footnotes in
> Footnote style as expected. They are left in Text Body, which is wrong
> (and surprisingly difficult to fix in LibreOffice).
>
> After a bit of trial and failure, it seems the error depends
Hi,
The new ODT exporter sometimes, but not always fails to put footnotes in
Footnote style as expected. They are left in Text Body, which is wrong
(and surprisingly difficult to fix in LibreOffice).
After a bit of trial and failure, it seems the error depends on the
scope of export:
Exporting
11 matches
Mail list logo
