I'll help fix it in the next few days. The HTML you're producing
at present is not too bad, but the top-line declaration sets it
to html 4.0 loose --- which is what concerned me.
> "Carsten" == Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carsten> Unfortunately I am a total amateur as far
Unfortunately I am a total amateur as far as HTML is concerned. What
is wrong about the HTML I am producing?
- Carsten
On May 25, 2006, at 3:32, T. V. Raman wrote:
I noticed that the html org mode produces is sadly html 4.0 loose
--- about the buggiest kind of HTML we could produce.
Before
I noticed that the html org mode produces is sadly html 4.0 loose
--- about the buggiest kind of HTML we could produce.
Before it is too late, could we produce well-formed XHTML? Since
it is auto-generated, it should not make any difference to the
org user, but will have the effect of producing we
