Unfortunately I am a total amateur as far as HTML is concerned. What
is wrong about the HTML I am producing?
- Carsten
On May 25, 2006, at 3:32, T. V. Raman wrote:
I noticed that the html org mode produces is sadly html 4.0 loose
--- about the buggiest kind of HTML we could produce.
Before it is too late, could we produce well-formed XHTML? Since
it is auto-generated, it should not make any difference to the
org user, but will have the effect of producing well-formed
markup.
I switched from using muse to org --- and like everything about
org except the bad HTML aspect of its current incarnation ---
muse lets you produce either html or xhtml as an option.
--
Best Regards,
--raman
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
AIM: emacspeak GTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Google: tv+raman
IRC: irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
--
Carsten Dominik
Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek"
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Kruislaan 403
NL-1098SJ Amsterdam
phone: +31 20 525 7477
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
