Re: (Feature Request) add more entry points to configure some export functionality

2020-05-19 Thread Timothy
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > As a side note, I think sending plain text messages, instead of HTML, > is better, at least on a (this?) mailing list. Good news on that front --- I didn't think my mail client did that, turns out that it does :) > This argument doesn't scale. There's no guarantee an eq

Re: (Feature Request) add more entry points to configure some export functionality

2020-05-19 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Timothy writes: As a side note, I think sending plain text messages, instead of HTML, is better, at least on a (this?) mailing list. > Indeed. Though my 2c on this sort of thing that the most important > factor is consistency. IMO if org-html-checkbox-types exists, then an > equivalent should al

Re: (Feature Request) add more entry points to configure some export functionality

2020-05-19 Thread Timothy
Nicolas, > You asked for it, though, using `pp'. I guess I did, didn't I 😅 > is just a string, with properties attached. If you simply return `text', you > will only see "string" Good to know, thanks :) >> I still feel that it would be nicer to have the body of this cl-case (from >> org-latex-

(Feature Request) add more entry points to configure some export functionality

2020-05-19 Thread Timothy
It's me again! We're now onto email 2/4. This one is a wish-list of entry points for customising export functionality (well, styling). I'm a big fan of trying to make my documents look snazzy with minimal work (i.e. by cramming all the snazzyness in the back-end), which is why I was thrilled to

Re: (Feature Request) add more entry points to configure some export functionality

2020-05-19 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Timothy writes: > Once again, thanks for taking the time to respond. I can assure you > that it's much appreciated :) You're welcome. > By item filter, I assume you are referring to > org-export-filter-item-functions. That looks quite promising. I just tried a > minimal function to testit > (

Re: (Feature Request) add more entry points to configure some export functionality

2020-05-19 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Timothy writes: > We're now onto email 2/4. This one is a wish-list of entry points for > customising export functionality (well, styling). Export framework has *many* entry points already. See (info "(org)Advanced Export Configuration") > I'm a big fan of trying to make my documents l

(Feature Request) add more entry points to configure some export functionality

2020-05-18 Thread Timothy
It's me again! We're now onto email 2/4. This one is a wish-list of entry points for customising export functionality (well, styling). I'm a big fan of trying to make my documents look snazzy with minimal work (i.e. by cramming all the snazzyness in the back-end), which is why I was thrilled to