Timothy <tecos...@gmail.com> writes: As a side note, I think sending plain text messages, instead of HTML, is better, at least on a (this?) mailing list.
> Indeed. Though my 2c on this sort of thing that the most important > factor is consistency. IMO if org-html-checkbox-types exists, then an > equivalent should also exist for other primary/default export > backends. This argument doesn't scale. There's no guarantee an equivalent is meaningful in every export back end. E.g., what is the HTML equivalent for `org-latex-classes', or `org-latex-default-table-environment'? In any case, if a "consistency patrol" wants to look into export back ends and handle "fixable" inconsistencies, why not. I assume this requires a good knowledge in every output format so as to make sure this is consistent everywhere.
