Hi Niels,
niels giesen writes:
> The following changes (replace-match literally in
> `org-export-docbook-finalize-table') solves this problem for me, but I
> would not know whether this would break anything else.
>
> #+begin_src diff
> diff --git a/lisp/org-docbook.el b/lisp/org-docbook.el
> ind
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Oct 25, 2010, at 11:52 PM, Baoqiu Cui wrote:
>
>> Sebastian Rose writes:
>>
>>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>>> OK, I will use class. I could make a special case for the docbook
>>>> exporter..
>>>
Sebastian Rose writes:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>> OK, I will use class. I could make a special case for the docbook
>> exporter..
>
> +1
+1 for making a "special case for the docbook exporter". :-) (DocBook
documents can be rendered in different formats, some of which (like PDF)
may know
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Baoqiu,
>
> (or any other users of the docbook exporter)
> I am not sure if the docbook format has suffered from this change,
> could you please run a few tests involving tables and report back?
Thanks for supporting this new feature. DocBook exporter does not
really s
noindent
@@ -9860,7 +9861,7 @@ For more information, see the documentation on Worg.
@section DocBook export
@cindex DocBook export
@cindex PDF export
-...@cindex Cui, Baoqui
+...@cindex Cui, Baoqiu
Org contains a DocBook exporter written by Baoqiu Cui. Once an Org file is
exported to DocBook
dsm...@vtiinstruments.com (Dale P. Smith) writes:
> Baoqiu Cui writes:
>
>> Before I change the document for variable
>> `org-export-docbook-xslt-proc-command', let's finalize the design of
>> this first. :-)
>>
>> Currently `org-export-docbook-
dsm...@vtiinstruments.com (Dale P. Smith) writes:
Hi Dale and Carsten,
> Carsten Dominik writes:
>
>> do I still need to do something with #+XSLT? If yes, could you please
>> spell it out for me?
>
> Ok!
>
> So now the command to process docbook to whatever is more flexible.
> Previously, the t
Hi Carsten,
Here is a small patch to remove the warning of a free variable `old' in
org.el. Just noticed that today.
diff --git a/lisp/org.el b/lisp/org.el
index 06daa9c..0da5ba3 100644
--- a/lisp/org.el
+++ b/lisp/org.el
@@ -15552,7 +15552,7 @@ BEG and END default to the buffer boundaries."
9:25 PM, Dale P. Smith wrote:
>
>> Baoqiu Cui writes:
>>
>>> Hi Dale,
>>>
>>> Dale Smith writes:
>>>
>>>> Dale Smith writes:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> The current org-export-docbook-xslt-proc-command is
Dave Mason writes:
> Matt Price writes:
>
>> I see from the archives that the topic of two-way org <--> wiki
>> export/import has been raised before . Is anyone doing anything of
>> this nature, or alternatively, does anyone even have a straightforward
>> workflow for org --> wiki exports? I h
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Baoqiu,
>
> thanks for the patch, I have applied it. Hopefully this will work in
> the
> export backends, but it might - otherwise we will see bug reports soon
> enough...
Thanks, Carsten. I have tried my test case for LaTeX, DocBook, and HTML
exporters and everyth
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On May 12, 2010, at 7:39 AM, Baoqiu Cui wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> I like the idea of inline image display too, but hit the similar
>> problems. After reading the code in org.el, I found that the inline
>> image file link has t
"ro...@iinet.net.au" writes:
> I very much like the idea of native inline image display in Org-mode but
> can't
> seem to make it work.
>
> Given a 6.36 snapshot or 6.36 release and these org file contents
>
> * Test image
> Test image
> [[Screenshot.png]]
>
>
> I hoped org would display that i
"ro...@iinet.net.au" writes:
> I very much like the idea of native inline image display in Org-mode but
> can't
> seem to make it work.
>
> Given a 6.36 snapshot or 6.36 release and these org file contents
>
> * Test image
> Test image
> [[Screenshot.png]]
>
>
> I hoped org would display that i
Hi Carsten,
Attached please find the patch to support this new feature in the
DocBook exporter:
diff --git a/lisp/org-docbook.el b/lisp/org-docbook.el
index bb8d048..d7ea4b7 100644
--- a/lisp/org-docbook.el
+++ b/lisp/org-docbook.el
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ publishing directory."
table-buffer table
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Apr 3, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Baoqiu Cui wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>>> Hi Baoqiu,
>>>
>>> I did apply the patch - by hand because the Emai program did wrap one
>>> or two lines.
>>>
>>>
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Baoqiu,
>
> I did apply the patch - by hand because the Emai program did wrap one
> or two lines.
>
> Please check if everything went well.
Thanks for the quick action, Carsten! Your patch applying was perfect,
and you actually fixed an indentation problem in my ori
Hi Carsten,
I've made corresponding changes in org-docbook.el to support this
feature in the DocBook exporter. Please check the attached patch, in
which I also fixed a minor bug that was introduced in your recent change
of "new and better support for entities".
diff --git a/lisp/org-docbook.el b
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Baoqiu and Mario,
>
> clearly, writing =double[3][3]= is the correct solution to this problem.
>
> As for the behavior of [3][3], this is not clearly defined. Neither
> the LaTeX
> nor the HTML exporter handle this case gracefully, as in producing
> meaningful output
"Mario E. Munich" writes:
> Dear Baoqiu,
>
> thanks a lot for the reply... I have done some level of debugging (I
> should have probably done it before, but I was not sure of what was
> going on) and I had realized that the problem is in using brackets [ ]
> in the text.
Hi Mario,
Thanks for p
"Mario E. Munich" writes:
> Dear Baoqiu,
>
> thanks a lot for the reply... I have done some level of debugging (I
> should have probably done it before, but I was not sure of what was
> going on) and I had realized that the problem is in using brackets [ ]
> in the text.
>
> Please find enclosed
"Mario E. Munich" writes:
> *What steps will reproduce the problem?*
> 1. orgmode 0.34c, emacs 23 on Ubuntu 9.10 (this function used to work
> in previous
> versions of orgmode)
> 2. Write an org file
> 3. Use the provided function to export as twiki to find the error message
>
> *What is the exp
Birch Browning writes:
> Has anyone here been successful in exporting an orgmode document to docbook,
> coverting it to texinfo and then to PDF? If so, would you kindly tell me how
> you accomplished this?
>
> I can successfully produce a PDF from Docbook export, but would like to get
> it into t
Richard Moreland writes:
> Hi all,
>
> MobileOrg 1.0 is now available in the iTunes AppStore:
> http://bit.ly/1kpHqg Documentation (including a screencast demonstrating
> the app) is available on the website at http://mobileorg.ncogni.to.
>
> Many thanks to Carsten and all the beta testers who h
Hi,
Bernt Hansen writes:
> Nick Dokos writes:
>
>> Bernt Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> Actually you're right - I didn't notice that. If I export via docbook
>>> (C-c C-e V) it looks better: http://www.norang.ca/tmp/x-3.pdf
>>>
>>
>> Yes, it does look much better (does it work as well with HTML?).
>
Hi Dale,
Dale Smith writes:
> Dale Smith writes:
>
> The current org-export-docbook-xslt-proc-command is a format string,
> with a fixed order of arguments (the fo filename and then the input
> docbook filname). Thats probably good enough for most (all?) xslt
> processors, but
Hi Madhu,
Madhu Rao writes:
> Carsten,
> I don't seem to have this problem on the latest pull. Don't know
> what resolved it.
You might have run into the same problem that I ran into (see messages
posted recently with subject "Compilation error about
org-protecting-blocks").
AFAIK,
Carsten,
Recent changes to respect example indentations introduced a bug in both
DocBook and HTML exporters. The following example
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
Group of lines separated by empty lines:
Line One.
Line Two.
Line Th
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Jun 14, 2009, at 8:22 AM, Baoqiu Cui wrote:
>
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> Thanks for the quick fix. However the problem still exists on my
>> computer (running "GNU Emacs 22.3.1 (i386-apple-darwin9.5.0, Carbon
>> Version 1.6.0) of
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Fixed, thanks.
>
> - Carsten
>
> On Jun 14, 2009, at 7:42 AM, Baoqiu Cui wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just did the following:
>>
>> git pull
>> make clean
>> make all
>>
>> but hit this error:
>
Cameron Horsburgh writes:
> At Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:32:21 -0700,
> Baoqiu Cui wrote:
>>
>> Nick Dokos writes:
>>
>> > Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> >
>> >> One more: How about this one:
>> >>
>> >> For question two I
Hi,
I just did the following:
git pull
make clean
make all
but hit this error:
...
In toplevel form:
lisp/org-exp.el:31:1:Error: Symbol's value as variable is void:
org-protecting-blocks
make: *** [lisp/org-exp.elc] Error 1
Is this a known problem?
Thanks,
Baoqiu
Nick Dokos writes:
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> One more: How about this one:
>>
>> For question two I currently have:
>>
>>We should win because by letting people shape their
>>productive selves, org-mode has spawned the best
>>community of life hackers in the world.
>>
>> Just
Tennis Smith writes:
> Hi,Has anyone figured out a way to export from org to a trac wiki? I've
> tried ascii (ugly) and html (doesn't work).Tks,-T
Recently I wrote an XSL stylesheet that converts DocBook documents to
TWiki format (see docbook2twiki.googlecode.com/). You may want to
modify it
Rustom Mody writes:
> On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Carsten Dominik
> wrote:
>>
>> On May 28, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Rustom Mody wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Baoqiu,
>>>
>>> Rustom Mody gmail.com> writes:
>>>
Baoqiu wrote:
Can you use #+BEGIN_DOCBOOK ... #+END_DOCBOOK instead to achieve what
>>>
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On May 27, 2009, at 2:13 AM, Dale Smith wrote:
>
>> Greetings List,
>>
>> I was suprised an pleased to discover that the docbook exporter has
>> the ability to apply the stylesheets to transform to fo and to also
>> process that to pdf. Somehing I'd like to see is a doc
EGIN_DOCBOOK ... #+END_DOCBOOK instead to achieve what
you want?
Thanks,
Baoqiu
> From: Carsten Dominik
> To: Baoqiu Cui
> Cc: Carsten Dominik
> Subject: Re: [Orgmode] Re: markup in environments in latex export
> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:24:27 +0200
>
> Hi Baoqiu,
>
Hi Rustom,
Rustom Mody writes:
> Thanks Carsten for 6.27.
>
> Ive been playing around with docbook export and further processing and
> was looking for something like export-special.
> Now its come but not (yet) for the docbook exporter.
What do you mean by export-special? Do you mean exporting
Dale Smith writes:
> Baoqiu Cui writes:
>
>> Thanks for reporting this bug. For some reason I missed the coverage of
>> macro support in DocBook exporter, and the bug was caused by an
>> "optimization" that I thought I did in the code... Variable
>> o
Hi Dale,
Dale Smith writes:
> {{{maxro}}} expansion does not happen for docbook export until an html
> export is done. After that, macros seems to be expanded properly for
> docbook export.
Thanks for reporting this bug. For some reason I missed the coverage of
macro support in DocBook export
ocbookp".
>
> Boy was *that* easy! Works great. Thanks Baoqiu Cui.
Thanks for making this work for DocBook exporter. I have not tried
ditaa, but I am glad to know that everything works with DocBook with
your simple patch.
Can ditaa generate SVG images from ASCII arts? I'l
butors are moving to Foswiki,
then it is a good move to convert.
No matter what, Foswiki and TWiki should try to be 100% compatible.
Baoqiu
> On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 09:29:37PM -0700, Baoqiu Cui wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> Russell Adams writes:
>>
>> > You mean
-0700, Baoqiu Cui wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently I wrote an XSL stylesheet that converts DocBook documents to
>> TWiki (http://www.twiki.org/) format, and it can be used to convert Org
>> files to TWiki format using DocBook exporter as a bridge. I have used
>&
Hi,
Recently I wrote an XSL stylesheet that converts DocBook documents to
TWiki (http://www.twiki.org/) format, and it can be used to convert Org
files to TWiki format using DocBook exporter as a bridge. I have used
it to generate some of my recent TWiki documents at work from Org mode
files, and
Hi Carsten,
It seems that a minor old bug in LaTeX exporter was exposed recently by
your timestamp change. When exporting a simple Org file that contains
just the following two lines to LaTeX format, I got an error message
saying "Invalid use of `\' in replacement text":
* DONE Test
CLOSED: [2
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Baoqiu,
>
> I really don't see why. Under what circumstances would you
> want to mix list types like this, without at least on little
> transition sentence between the lists? I cannot remember any
> occasion when I would have wanted this to be possible.
This may be
Hi Leo,
Leo writes:
1. Ordered List Item 1
2. Ordered List Item 2
- Itemized List Item 1
- Itemized List Item 2
- Itemized List Item 3
> mixing lists is easy to do. Just use Alt + to
> decrease/increase the item's indentation.
Increasing the indentation
Carsten Dominik writes:
>> 1. Bug One: two consecutive lists with different list types at the
>> same
>> level are exported as *one* list. For example, the following two
>> lists
>>
>> 1. Ordered List Item 1
>> 2. Ordered List Item 2
>>
>> - Itemized List Item 1
>> - Itemized List It
Hi Carsten,
During the weekend, I found and fixed two bugs that exist in
HTML/DocBook exporters (see the following descriptions). I am attaching
a patch for the fixes at the end of this email.
1. Bug One: two consecutive lists with different list types at the same
level are exported as *one*
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Possible solutions:
>
> 1. Allow #+begin_example and friends to be indented and remove the same
>amount of whitespace from all example lines as the #+begin line has.
>This is possible, but would require a lot of work in the LaTeX
> exporter.
>It
Matthew Lundin writes:
> Carsten,
>
> Matthew Lundin writes:
>
>> If I may be so bold, I'd like to request an additional setting for
>> org-empty-line-terminates-plain-lists. Namely, I was wondering if it
>> would be possible to add an option whereby 2 empty lines would terminate
>> a plain list
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Baoqiu,this is just an omission, fixed now. Thanks.- CarstenOn
Thanks for the quick fix!
Baoqiu
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.g
Daniel Clemente writes:
> El dl, mar 23 2009, Baoqiu Cui va escriure:
>
>> Am I missing anything (or do I have to customize variable
>> org-emphasis-regexp-components to support this)? I tried to search the
>> mailing list archive about this, but could not find an
Hi,
Today I just found out that the exclamation mark ('!') is not allowed as
postmatch in org-emphasis-regexp-components, but '?' is. For example:
This is *NOT BOLD*!
Is there any special reason behind this? It seems to me that both '!'
and '?' are commonly used at the end of a sentence, and
Rainer Thiel writes:
> I want to report what I think is a bug in the routines for exporting
> checkbox lists into LaTeX-related formats (including pdf).
>
> While checkboxes checked in orgmode appear as checked in html and
> ascii exports, all boxes are blank (unchecked) in LaTeX and related
> ex
It seems that the newly added feature BEGIN_CENTER only supports *one*
paragraph, i.e. only the first paragraph after BEGIN_CENTER will be
centered in exported HTML format.
For example, for the following lines in my Org file:
#+BEGIN_CENTER
Everything should be made as simple as possible,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Mar 12, 2009, at 9:39 PM, Emilio Garcia Cota wrote:
>
>> #+TITLE: (bug|feature)? report -- exporting ~verbatim~ and =code=
>> into Latex
>> #+AUTHOR: me
>> #+EMAIL: e...@ma.il
>> # I use latest Git (that's 1 commit ahead of 6.24c) on Emacs 22.3.1
>>
>> * ~verbatim~ an
Baoqiu Cui writes:
>> Dale Smith writes:
>>
>>> Somthing that muse has that I'd really like to see in org is some way
>>> to insert raw docbook into the exported output. The LaTeX exporter
>>> already has a feature like this. Muse-mode uses the
Baoqiu Cui writes:
> Dale Smith writes:
>
>> Somthing that muse has that I'd really like to see in org is some way
>> to insert raw docbook into the exported output. The LaTeX exporter
>> already has a feature like this. Muse-mode uses the tag.
>>
>>
Hi Dale,
Dale Smith writes:
> Baoqiu Cui writes:
>
>> I just posted the code for DocBook exporter to Google Code.
>
> I've been enjoying this docbook exporter for sveral days now. Thanks
> Baoqiu!
Thanks a lot for your great help in testing this exporter. You
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Baoqui,
>
> thank you very much for creating this exporter, and for contributing
> it to Org.
>
> Do you have a copyright assignment with the FSF that would cover Org-
> mode?
> If not, would you be willing to sign one? This will give us the freedom
> t
would be willing to to the necessary
> work to keep it up to date and working.
I won't have any problem with maintaining this exporter.
Thanks,
Baoqiu
> Best wishes
>
> - Carsten
>
> On Mar 8, 2009, at 6:10 AM, Baoqiu Cui wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just poste
Baoqiu Cui writes:
> Dale Smith writes:
>
>> Baoqiu Cui writes:
>>
>>> The only thing that is missing (at least to me) in current Org-mode is
>>> the exporter for DocBook format.
>>
>> There is quite a bit of similarity between org and muse for
Dale Smith writes:
> Sebastian Rose writes:
>
>> Gour writes:
>>> Otoh, number of tags in DocBook is overwhelming and, imgo, way too
>>> distracting for most documentation tasks, at least, for *my* use-cases.
>>
>>
>> It is, and that's exactly why the DocBook export is such a great thing.
>>
>
Gour writes:
>>>>>> "Baoqiu" == Baoqiu Cui writes:
>
> Baoqiu> I knew it must be FOP that you did not like. ;-) I had similar
> Baoqiu> experience using FOP, and I (and all other team members) had to
> Baoqiu> find workarounds when hitting proble
Hi,
I just posted the code for DocBook exporter to Google Code. You can use
the following link to get access to the code and example files:
http://code.google.com/p/bcui-emacs/source/browse/#svn/trunk/org-docbook
Here is the README:
Hi Gour,
Gour writes:
>>>>>> "Baoqiu" == Baoqiu Cui writes:
>
> Baoqiu> It is true that many open-source tools around DocBook are still
> Baoqiu> not perfect, but they should be good enough for most of the work
> Baoqiu> of most users. Some co
Gour writes:
>> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Rose writes:
>
> Sebastian> I highly apreciate the support of Docbook and your
> Sebastian> effort. Yet, I think I don't want to publish XHTML through
> Sebastian> Docbook.
>
> +1
>
> I gave up on DocBook long ago. It's pain to author documents in i
Dale Smith writes:
> Sebastian Rose writes:
>
>> The LaTeX and XHTML export (which, by the
>> way, could be transformed just as good as docbook) work and are widely
>> used.
>
> I'm not sure sure. I think docbook is much more content oriented than
> LaTeX and xhtml, which seem to be more presen
Sebastian Rose writes:
>> I have not tried it, but it seems that syntax highlighting of source
>> code listing can be done. See this page:
>>
>> http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/SyntaxHighlighting.html
>
>
> Does this know about the fonts and colors I use in Emacs? htmlize.el
> does.
I don
Sebastian Rose writes:
>
> I think we would find hundreds of xslt stylesheets on the web to
> transform Docbook to virtually any format.
Yes, this is the power and beauty of DocBook.
> Will we loose the features of htmlize.el?
> I'm not familiar with the Docbook DTD - I know it includes lots of
er (e.g. the XHTML
> exporter) and could provide xslt stylesheets to transform the output.
>
> This would guaranty a slitely more complete and bugfree export, which is
> configured from one org-publish-project-alist.
>
> Regards,
>
>Sebastian
>
>
>
> Dale Smith
Dale Smith writes:
> Baoqiu Cui writes:
>
>> The only thing that is missing (at least to me) in current Org-mode is
>> the exporter for DocBook format.
>
> There is quite a bit of similarity between org and muse formats. I've
> found that I can edit .muse files
Baoqiu Cui writes:
> Hello Dominik,
Sorry, I meant "Prof. Dominik". The email address misled me. :-)
Baoqiu
> use it two weeks ago. I've been using (X)Emacs since 1995, and had
> tried to use Muse about 2-3 years ago for note-taking and simple
> publishin
74 matches
Mail list logo
