You can try the below config :-)
(defun eh-org-wash-text (text backend _info)
"导出 org file 时,删除中文之间不必要的空格。"
(when (or (org-export-derived-backend-p backend 'html)
(org-export-derived-backend-p backend 'odt))
(let ((regexp "[[:multibyte:]]")
(string text))
;;
Consider the following org document.
* Test
1本人不想亲自拿到学历学位证书、急于离校者,可书面委托他人代领学历学位证
书,29日起即可离校;2本人想亲自领取学历学位证书者,按学校规定的程序及有关
要求办理离校手续,领取相关证书后离校;
This was produced by pasting in a single, long line, and then using alt-Q (a
normal thing to do, and good for readability, because org-mode doesn't wrap
li
Hello,
Sorry for the delayed reply.
On Sunday, 27 Jun 2021 at 10:12, Jack Kamm wrote:
@Colin, thanks for your feedback. I have to confess that I didn't know about
the second file
parameter at all until I provided the patch. I just discovered main branch
works with the second :file
specificati
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 at 12:01, Bhavin Gandhi wrote:
>
> Till now I found that the function `org-add-log-setup' is getting
> called twice. Why that's happening, I'm not sure yet. I think running
> edebug will help here, I'm going to try that.
>
I found the reason for this behavior with the help of e
Tory, Dave D write:
>...> issues with org-log-note-clock-out...
> this commit
> https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/commit/8e3e2f667f0b28b85845204b708c3f0aebc9152b
> probably fixes the issue. Could you perhaps give it a test?
Yes, please!
I also guess that the commit by Nicolas is a fix for
I introduced an error in the previous patch. Please use this one.
Thank you,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.6-571-gc591be
: Latest paper written in org: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05096
>From ddad85139bd508a06db6e98ddef0131f7cc9946e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric
On Monday, 28 Jun 2021 at 08:26, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> Oh, for sure; I agree it'd be good to get this merged for those of us
> that need to get academic work done now!
Especially now that (at least for me) all teaching activities are mostly
over and done with and I can concentrate on my research.
Hello all,
increasingly, I need URL and DOI BiBTeX entries to cite particular types
of publications. Some BiBTeX styles now recognise these but the current
BiBTeX exporter in org does not export these. I have added :url and
:doi entries to the list of optional entries to export when present to a
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:22 AM Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> On Monday, 28 Jun 2021 at 08:09, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> > FWIW, I added a function to format org-cite here, which you can use
> > with ivy-bibtex also.
>
> Thank you. Very comprehensive. Mine is much simpler! But I have two
> versions, one
On Monday, 28 Jun 2021 at 08:09, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> FWIW, I added a function to format org-cite here, which you can use
> with ivy-bibtex also.
Thank you. Very comprehensive. Mine is much simpler! But I have two
versions, one for the master branch and one for the wip-cite-new branch
and I h
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 7:07 AM Eric S Fraga wrote:
> It would be nice to have this merged with master so that I can have the
> rest of my workflow at hand; e.g. I have ivy-bibtex inserting links to
> citations automatically but I have to change the format of what it
> inserts depending on which
On Saturday, 26 Jun 2021 at 10:35, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Emmanuel Charpentier writes:
>> Related question : is there an ETA of these new abilities in =Org= ?
>
> I would appreciate some alpha-testing first, but I would say the code is
> already good enough for inclusion at this point. I.e., the
On Saturday, 26 Jun 2021 at 16:10, Léo Ackermann wrote:
> @EricSFrada, would you mind sharing your code for your proof sections ?
> If you've got ideas for this module, or/and want to participate to its
> development, please let me know :)
I have no code for proofs. Sorry! I was simply illustrat
On Monday, 28 Jun 2021 at 08:28, Sébastien Miquel wrote:
> Léo Ackermann writes:
>> @EricSFrada, would you mind sharing your code for your proof sections ?
> This functionality is now built-in: headings with an `ignore' tag do
> not get exported (their contents do). For very large proof, this seems
> Jack Kamm writes:
> Hi all,
>> I obviously missing something. The above works for me without the
>> patch. Unfortunately, I can't trace back the thread in order to
>> understand the context.
> I think this is a followup from this mail:
> https://orgmode.org/list/87
Hi,
Léo Ackermann writes:
@EricSFrada, would you mind sharing your code for your proof sections ?
This functionality is now built-in: headings with an `ignore' tag do not get
exported (their contents do). For very large proof, this seems like the
right
thing to do.
In small to moderate sized
16 matches
Mail list logo