On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 7:18 AM, Frederick Giasson wrote:
> There is one last thing related to =org-babel-detangle= that seems "broken"
> is that as far as I can see, the top =save-excursion= should save the
> position of the cursor of the source file and keep the buffer at that
> position when we
>> Further I use this patch already for some days and could not find any
>> issue.
>
> thank you! do you think this patch could be integrated into core?
Yes, I think so.
Hopefully Nicolas and Bastien see it the same way.
BTW meanwhile you could overwrite function org-agenda-mode with the
patc
Just an update to let you know that I decided to migrate from
Org-mode+LaTeX to ODF-and-related, particularly because of LPPL+GPL
incompatibility, caused by LaTeX and related projects and because
ODF-and-related are easier for the other people to participate and see
the changes (no need to compile
On 6/5/18, Marco Wahl wrote:
> The following is an alternative patch which I think is preferable. It
> just keeps the needed local variables for the text-scale (aka zoom) in
> good order in function org-agenda-mode.
> Further I use this patch already for some days and could not find any
> issue.
Hello,
Matt Lundin writes:
> With commit fbe56f89f75a8979e0ba48001a822518df2c66fe, the function
> org-get-tags incorrectly removes uninherited tags from the list of tags
> it returns, *even if* they are local tags.
>
> Expected behavior: org-get-tags should always return local tags,
> regardless
With commit fbe56f89f75a8979e0ba48001a822518df2c66fe, the function
org-get-tags incorrectly removes uninherited tags from the list of tags
it returns, *even if* they are local tags.
Expected behavior: org-get-tags should always return local tags,
regardless of whether they are excluded from inheri
>> 2] i also find that refreshing resets the zoom level created using
>> text-scale-increase. i wonder if this can also be preserved. to me,
>> refreshing refers to updating the contents of the agenda view, not
>> things like text scale.
>
> This is a wanted feature AFAICT. I think the followin
Hi Nicolas,
> Here it is. If you =detangle= the =broken-detangle--working.el= file, it
> > will work as expected.
> >
> > However, if you try to detangle the =broken-detangle--NOT-working.el=
> file,
> > you should get a "Not in a source block" error in *message*.
>
> This is fixed in "master".
>
Hello,
Frederick Giasson writes:
> Here it is. If you =detangle= the =broken-detangle--working.el= file, it
> will work as expected.
>
> However, if you try to detangle the =broken-detangle--NOT-working.el= file,
> you should get a "Not in a source block" error in *message*.
This is fixed in "m
