Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Daniel Bausch writes: >> > However, I'd like to ask, what happens, if one refers to a >> > name of a source block where data is expected, does it then refer to >> > the results produced by that source block? How are such situations >> > handeled at the moment? >> >> Try it out, but be ready to

[O] Clocking table for all org-files

2011-10-25 Thread ishi soichi
Hi. Clocking capability is nice and powerful. I'm wondering if there is a way to generate a clocking table for ALL org files that are registered as "org-agenda-files" ? I have currently set up several agenda files in order to keep track of many projects. I use the clocking functionality for each

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Daniel Bausch
Am Dienstag 25 Oktober 2011, 19:21:22 schrieb Nick Dokos: > Eric Schulte wrote: > > Martyn Jago writes: > > > Nick Dokos writes: > > >> Eric Schulte wrote: > > >>> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I > > >>> haven't yet voted, and although I would have though #+source

Re: [O] Bill-of-materials

2011-10-25 Thread Bastien
Hi Frozenlock, Frozenlock writes: > I'm trying to push my changes to the Worg repo, but it asks me for my > repo.or.cz's password. > This confuses me, as the repo.or.cz states that they don't use > password. You need to register as a user on repo.or.cz: http://repo.or.cz/reguser.cgi then wr

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Daniel Bausch
> > However, I'd like to ask, what happens, if one refers to a > > name of a source block where data is expected, does it then refer to > > the results produced by that source block? How are such situations > > handeled at the moment? > > Try it out, but be ready to press C-g, because I would gue

Re: [O] Bill-of-materials

2011-10-25 Thread Frozenlock
Hi Bastien, I'm trying to push my changes to the Worg repo, but it asks me for my repo.or.cz's password. This confuses me, as the repo.or.cz states that they don't use password. One of the changes I've made is to host the org-bom.el on github (better than pastebin). https://github.com/Frozenlock/

[O] Bug: tags search in org-sparse-tree is broken

2011-10-25 Thread suvayu ali
Hi, The tags search for org-sparse-tree seems to be broken. With a minimal setup, C-c / m RET doesn't perform a tags search. I bisected the problem to this commit. dfcb6faef11a2439b56b18a6289803361d402130 is the first bad commit commit dfcb6faef11a2439b56b18a6289803361d402130 Author: Nicolas Go

[O] [babel] Announcing ob-picolisp.el

2011-10-25 Thread Thorsten
Hi list, with help and substancial input from Eric (Schulte) I added a new language to org-babel, the minimal lisp dialect picolisp [thanks to Eric!]. You can download the ob-picolisp.el file here: https://github.com/tj64/ob-picolisp Here is the README text as a little introduction to picolisp:

[O] org-capture template property completion

2011-10-25 Thread dlc
I am an emacs novice attempting to use an org-capture template. The manual indicates completion is available while expanding %^{prompt}. Can one get completion on %^{prop}p for a property? I tried the same syntax for prompt and that did not work. David

Re: [O] notify, when something to do

2011-10-25 Thread Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
Ha, the XMPP idea really appeals to me, endless possibilities :D Thanks for sharing. On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Christopher Allan Webber < cweb...@dustycloud.org> wrote: > Hey Peter, > > I also do appointments with orgmode.. I have it hooked up so that it > sends me messages via XMPP/Jab

Re: [O] FYI: Org mode testing framework, Emacs 23 and 22

2011-10-25 Thread Martyn Jago
Hi Brian Wightman writes: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Sebastien Vauban > wrote: >> For my information, why do you need to test that 2 suites don't run at the >> same time?  They only write to temp buffers, no?  Can they conflict? > > If they do conflict and only one set of tests should r

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Nick Dokos
Eric Schulte wrote: > Martyn Jago writes: > > > Nick Dokos writes: > > > >> Eric Schulte wrote: > >> > >>> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I haven't > >>> yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would have been > >>> the winner I like the simplicity

Re: [O] Patch: Mark org-diary-class as obsolete and skip entries on holidays in org-class

2011-10-25 Thread Rüdiger Sonderfeld
Hi Carsten, On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:08:43 +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > > The first is accepted. The second I have modified. If any of > SKIP-WEEKS is the symbol `holidays', then holidays will be skipped. That sounds good. Thank you. Regards, Rüdiger

Re: [O] feature suggestion: apply datetime prompt magic to selected region

2011-10-25 Thread Brian van den Broek
On 24 October 2011 08:00, Bastien wrote: > Hi Brian, > > suvayu ali writes: > >> Ah I see it now, you want the org-timestamp command to work on a >> region. Maybe you can write your own function with lisp if you are >> doing this too often. Should be quite simple to try. > > Please check `org-loo

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Eric Schulte
Martyn Jago writes: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> Eric Schulte wrote: >> >>> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I haven't >>> yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would have been >>> the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for named code blocks >

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Martyn Jago
Nick Dokos writes: > Eric Schulte wrote: > >> Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I haven't >> yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would have been >> the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for named code blocks >> as well as named data. So I

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Eric Schulte
> > Then maybe #+results for (anonymous) results only, but #+name for anything > else from [1] and [3]. This seems like a reasonable approach. > Wasn't there a concept of linking a results block to its originiating > source block by some id and we need a place to put the checksum in. Not that I

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-25 Thread Eric Schulte
> I think that makes sense. > > While thinking about all of this, and working in real-life documents, I just > came back to a suggestion which I made some time ago. It goes about this > enhancement: > > Would it be possible to specify "buffer-wide language specific" header > arguments? > Y

Re: [O] Bug?: handling asterisks "*" in HTML export

2011-10-25 Thread Giovanni Ridolfi
Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> I found two errors of org while handling asterisks "*" in HTML export. >> I don't think this is a bug, but I think it is worth to report. > > I've pushed a fix in master. Could you confirm that it is working? > yes it works, thanks, Giovanni

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Nick Dokos
Eric Schulte wrote: > Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I haven't > yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would have been > the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for named code blocks > as well as named data. So I'll vote for #+name: here ma

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Christian Moe
Surprisingly (to me) srcname is the winner here, but luckily I haven't yet voted, and although I would have though #+source: would have been the winner I like the simplicity of using #+name: for named code blocks as well as named data. Ditto -- it just wasn't on the table yet when I cast my vo

Re: [O] Bug?: handling asterisks "*" in HTML export

2011-10-25 Thread Rainer Stengele
Am 25.10.2011 16:42, schrieb Nicolas Goaziou: > Hello, > > Giovanni Ridolfi writes: > >> I found two errors of org while handling asterisks "*" in HTML export. >> I don't think this is a bug, but I think it is worth to report. > > I've pushed a fix in master. Could you confirm that it is workin

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Eric Schulte
Alright, I've tallied up the results and we have the following (with full voting information below [1]). Call lines | call | 13 | It seems unanimous that remote code block calls should use the #+call: syntax moving forward. Data and result names | (name results) | 3 | | name | 2 |

Re: [O] Bug?: handling asterisks "*" in HTML export

2011-10-25 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Giovanni Ridolfi writes: > I found two errors of org while handling asterisks "*" in HTML export. > I don't think this is a bug, but I think it is worth to report. I've pushed a fix in master. Could you confirm that it is working? Please note that single stars, in part 1 and 3, won't ap

Re: [O] Bug?: handling asterisks "*" in HTML export

2011-10-25 Thread Rainer Stengele
I have the same problem this org file creates the bug: * headline * test this doesn't: * headline - test Best, Rainer Am 25.10.2011 15:21, schrieb Giovanni Ridolfi: > > Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and > what in fact did happen. You don't know h

Re: [O] Patch: Mark org-diary-class as obsolete and skip entries on holidays in org-class

2011-10-25 Thread Carsten Dominik
Hi Rüdiger, On Oct 10, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote: > Hello, > I wrote two small patches. The first one marks org-diary-class as obsolete > (according to its documentation it is deprecated). The second one is a > patch for org-class. It changes org-class to skip entries that are on

Re: [O] BUG: footnote conflicts with code export to pdf

2011-10-25 Thread zwz
Nick Dokos writes: > zwz wrote: > > >> >> Then you modify it: >> >> #+begin_src org >> >> * test >> >> #+BEGIN_SRC c >> >> void main(){ >> >> int a[5]; >> >> } >> >> #+END_SRC >> >> #+end >> >> >> >> It says "org-export-latex-preprocess: Wrong type argument: stringp, >> > nil" >> >>

Re: [O] Blocked tasks also dimmed in export?

2011-10-25 Thread Gez
Just bumping this in case anyone can help me fix it - I'd really like the tasks to be greyed out in an export. Thanks, Gez On 13 October 2011 12:57, Gez wrote: > I use org-agenda-dim-blocked-tasks to keep track of "tasks" that have > no current "todo's", but in my exported html agenda view (C-c

[O] Querying Org-contacts with lbdb (e.g. for mutt)

2011-10-25 Thread Karl Voit
Hi! I want to share a solution that allows lbdb[1] queries return Org-contacts[2] email addresses. The solution is done by Russell Adams who encouraged me to post it here because he did only mention it in [3] but did not post the results yet. I took Russells solution and modified it to be of more

Re: [O] FYI: Org mode testing framework, Emacs 23 and 22

2011-10-25 Thread Brian Wightman
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote: > For my information, why do you need to test that 2 suites don't run at the > same time?  They only write to temp buffers, no?  Can they conflict? If they do conflict and only one set of tests should run at a time, shouldn't the second set

[O] Bug?: handling asterisks "*" in HTML export

2011-10-25 Thread Giovanni Ridolfi
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list. -

[O] HTML export, TODO keyword face

2011-10-25 Thread Peter Baranyi
Hi, I set up org todo keyword faces like so: (setq org-todo-keyword-faces '(("FAIL" . org-warning) ("MISSING" . org-warning) )) But at html export, the keywords are green because they are done states. So additionally I have to set : (setq org-export-html-style-extra "

[O] [Bug] Return on description link

2011-10-25 Thread Maximilian Matthé
Hi! See the attached org-file for more information. Hitting return on a link in a description list does not follow the link but insert . I have org-return-follows-link set to t. Regards, Max link.org Description: Binary data

[O] Bug in export to LaTex: Lists with source code blocks

2011-10-25 Thread Thomas Holst
Hello, there is a bug when exporting to LaTeX if there is a source code block inside a list. I have a file with the following contents: #+begin_org #+TITLE: Lists mit Source-Blocks #+AUTHOR:thomas.ho...@gmx.de #+EMAIL: Thomas Holst #+DATE: 25.10.2011 #+LANGUAGE: en

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-25 Thread Rainer M Krug
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Sebastien Vauban < wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> wrote: > Hi Rainer, > > Rainer M Krug wrote: > >> While thinking about all of this, and working in real-life documents, I > >> just > >> came back to a suggestion which I made some time ago. It goes about this > >> en

Re: [O] Suddenly, my timestamps get localized!

2011-10-25 Thread Tassilo Horn
"Sebastien Vauban" writes: >> And >> >> (setq system-time-locale (getenv "LANG")) >> >> resulting in "en_US.utf8" seems to work as well. What did not work >> for you in the agenda? > > When I wrote (months ago) "did not work", I meant: I got French > weekdays in my agenda ("Lun." for Monday, "

Re: [O] Suddenly, my timestamps get localized!

2011-10-25 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Tassilo, Tassilo Horn wrote: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > >>> What's going on? I even have no glue how org/emacs (correctly) >>> guesses that I'm German. My locale is en_US.UTF-8... >> >> Found in my .emacs: >> >> #+begin_src emacs-lisp >> ;; system locale to use for formatting time

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-25 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Rainer, Rainer M Krug wrote: >> While thinking about all of this, and working in real-life documents, I >> just >> came back to a suggestion which I made some time ago. It goes about this >> enhancement: >> >>Would it be possible to specify "buffer-wide language specific" header >>argum

Re: [O] Suddenly, my timestamps get localized!

2011-10-25 Thread Tassilo Horn
"Sebastien Vauban" writes: Hi Sebastien, >> What's going on? I even have no glue how org/emacs (correctly) >> guesses that I'm German. My locale is en_US.UTF-8... > > Found in my .emacs: > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > ;; system locale to use for formatting time values (e.g., timestamps in

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-25 Thread Rainer M Krug
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Sebastien Vauban < wxhgmqzgw...@spammotel.com> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Eric Schulte wrote: > >> #+BABEL: :var SVNVERSION=(vc-working-revision (buffer-file-name)) > >> #+BABEL: :var SVNSTATE=( symbol-name (vc-state (or (buffer-file-name) > org-current-export-file)))

Re: [O] Suddenly, my timestamps get localized!

2011-10-25 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
"Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Hi Tassilo, > > Tassilo Horn wrote: >> when I insert a new timestame, I now get >> >> <2011-10-25 Di> >> >> while it used to be <2011-10-25 Tue> until very recently. (Di is >> Dienstag which is German for Tuesday). I've briefly grepped the org >> source code, but

Re: [O] Suddenly, my timestamps get localized!

2011-10-25 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Tassilo, Tassilo Horn wrote: > when I insert a new timestame, I now get > > <2011-10-25 Di> > > while it used to be <2011-10-25 Tue> until very recently. (Di is > Dienstag which is German for Tuesday). I've briefly grepped the org > source code, but I cannot see any localization there. > >

[O] Suddenly, my timestamps get localized!

2011-10-25 Thread Tassilo Horn
Hi all, when I insert a new timestame, I now get <2011-10-25 Di> while it used to be <2011-10-25 Tue> until very recently. (Di is Dienstag which is German for Tuesday). I've briefly grepped the org source code, but I cannot see any localization there. What's going on? I even have no glue h

Re: [O] [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines

2011-10-25 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Eric, Eric Schulte wrote: >> #+BABEL: :var SVNVERSION=(vc-working-revision (buffer-file-name)) >> #+BABEL: :var SVNSTATE=( symbol-name (vc-state (or (buffer-file-name) >> org-current-export-file))) >> #+BABEL: :var SVNSTATENUM=(if (eq (vc-state (or (buffer-file-name) >> org-current-export-fil

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Rainer, Rainer M Krug wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Eric Schulte wrote: >>> Just to make it as easy as possible for everyone >>> Might it be possible to introduce a small flags like "obsolete" and >>> "stable" (standard) >>> Old functions, old syntax, etc., might move first to o

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Daniel, Daniel Bausch wrote: > Am Dienstag 25 Oktober 2011, 03:30:46 schrieb Eric Schulte: >> "Sebastien Vauban" writes: >> > Daniel Bausch wrote: >> >>> named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function" > > calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob" > >

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Jambunathan K
> #+object_begin var > x = 1 > y = 2 > #+end I was thinking on similar lines. This together with Nicolas's suggestion of "one name" will be wonderful. I think it is easier to explain what I think by means of an example. In case of lisp, the SAME variable name could either act as a function or a

Re: [O] [RFC] Standardized code block keywords

2011-10-25 Thread Daniel Bausch
Am Dienstag 25 Oktober 2011, 03:30:46 schrieb Eric Schulte: > "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > Daniel Bausch wrote: > >>> named code blocks [1] -- "source" "srcname" "function" > >>> > >>> calling external functions [2] -- "call" "lob" > >>> > >>> named