On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Ido Magal wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 03:51, Konrad Hinsen
> wrote:
>>
>> 1) An org-mode file that contains links to everything I am currently
>> working on, and which I change as projects start and end. This gives me
>> instant access to almost everything I
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 03:51, Konrad Hinsen
wrote:
>
>
> 1) An org-mode file that contains links to everything I am currently
> working on, and which I change as projects start and end. This gives me
> instant access to almost everything I need.
>
> 2) A buffer containing my agenda and to-do list.
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> John Hendy writes:
>
>>
>> Well, so far I should only have one version? Or not since I installed
>> emacs as well. I guess that could have overwritten some of the default
>> packages or mingled with them?
>>
>> Even so, could I just add a:
>>
John Hendy writes:
>
> Well, so far I should only have one version? Or not since I installed
> emacs as well. I guess that could have overwritten some of the default
> packages or mingled with them?
>
> Even so, could I just add a:
> ,---
> | (add-to-list 'load-path "~/.elisp/org.git/lisp")
> `--
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:55 PM, John Hendy wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>> John Hendy writes:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
John Hendy writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have a pretty simple file I just started at home:
>>>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> John Hendy writes:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>>> John Hendy writes:
>>>
Hi,
I have a pretty simple file I just started at home:
-
** [2011-03-09 Wed]
*** dinner
John Hendy writes:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
>> John Hendy writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a pretty simple file I just started at home:
>>> -
>>> ** [2011-03-09 Wed]
>>> *** dinner :fam:
>>> :LOGBO
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
> John Hendy writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a pretty simple file I just started at home:
>> -
>> ** [2011-03-09 Wed]
>> *** dinner :fam:
>> :LOGBOOK:
>> CLOCK: [2011-03-09 We
John Hendy writes:
> Hi,
>
> I have a pretty simple file I just started at home:
> -
> ** [2011-03-09 Wed]
> *** dinner:fam:
> :LOGBOOK:
> CLOCK: [2011-03-09 Wed 18:15]--[2011-03-09 Wed 19:00] => 0:45
> :END:
> *** watch
Hi,
I have a pretty simple file I just started at home:
-
** [2011-03-09 Wed]
*** dinner :fam:
:LOGBOOK:
CLOCK: [2011-03-09 Wed 18:15]--[2011-03-09 Wed 19:00] => 0:45
:END:
*** watched music videos with Felicity/played g
On 2011-03-11 02:19 +0800, Bastien wrote:
> It is not: in Org 7.5 (vs 7.4), org-link face is inherited from link
> face. But you can still customize org-link face independantly.
I see. Thanks for that.
Leo
Bernt Hansen writes:
> Hi Markus,
>
> It looks like you have a drawer in your org files that is missing
> a closing :END: tag. Possibly in file "h:/org/600_install.org"
Hi Bernt and Nick,
yes, there is/was an issue with a missing :END: in that particular
file. I kept adding it, but for some w
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:46:16 -0700
Samuel Wales wrote:
> I agree with the comments on complexity and inapplicability. IMO it
> would be better to arrange existing menus and documentation to
> emphasize basics.
I think this might be a more productive proposal than having an
expert-mode. Also in
Hi,
I also agree with Joost and Eric. I don't think hiding the menu on
export is a good thing in the long run. Org-mode is a moving target and
new things show up in the menu over time -- and I for one would miss the
new stuff if the menu was always off.
I do however like the 'expert' setting in
Eric S Fraga wrote:
> This is a sort of bug report but possibly more a curiosity...
>
> I imagine this has something to do with time 0 in Unix but I cannot seem
> to be able to enter any date earlier than 1 Jan 1970 using C-c! (say).
> However, once I have entered a date (later than that), I can
On 3/10/11 2:12 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
But I wonder if there are really too many experts as against users
whose patterns of usage are expert in one area and noob in others.
+1.
I've been using a fair number of (what I think of as) Org power tools,
including Org-Babel, the Properties API, cus
Ah, right. I did misunderstand. Yes, that seems like a good solution.
Scot
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Nicolas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Scot Becker writes:
>
> > Looks good, but I can't get it to work. To test it, can I just
> > evaluate the two sexp's in the block you gave inside a scratc
Hello,
Scot Becker writes:
> Looks good, but I can't get it to work. To test it, can I just
> evaluate the two sexp's in the block you gave inside a scratch buffer,
> then switch to my trial org file and export to LaTeX?
Yes, but I guess you misunderstand the goal of the snippet. It will not
"f
Hi,
I tend to agree with Joost's sentiments.
In my opinion the current Org-mode---despite all of the power lurking
just beneath the surface---is entirely usable as a very simple plain
text notes buffer. The user need know nothing more than how to press
tab on a headline to expand-contract it's c
Looks good, but I can't get it to work. To test it, can I just evaluate the
two sexp's in the block you gave inside a scratch buffer, then switch to my
trial org file and export to LaTeX? Trying the OP's sample file gives the
same results before and after I evaluate this new bit of code, but I su
Bastien and others,
When I worked in Hoofddorp in the early 90's, I travelled 2.5 hours by
train every day. I reserved half of the train-time every single day
for a year checking out GNU Emacs stuff I didn't understand on my
notebook. This helped me a lot in going places (aka major modes, elisp
co
This is a sort of bug report but possibly more a curiosity...
I imagine this has something to do with time 0 in Unix but I cannot seem
to be able to enter any date earlier than 1 Jan 1970 using C-c! (say).
However, once I have entered a date (later than that), I can use
S- on the year to get to th
Bastien writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Org tries to stay as simple/accessible as possible for newbie and as
> complete/flexible as possible for power users.
>
> The documentation and the UI are central for this: the documentation
> should promote core features, document complex ones, and give pointers
> o
Unrelated: with external keyboard on a mac, my delete key sends
in emacs 22 and C-n in emacs 23. The former is bindable.
The latter is useless because C-n is needed.
Sorry to reply to myself, but I've pushed a change that should satisfy
emacsen older than 23 in that area.
I agree with the comments on complexity and inapplicability. IMO it
would be better to arrange existing menus and documentation to
emphasize basics.
--
AIDS 2.0 is here now:
http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2010/12/welcome-to-kafka-pandemic-two-forces_9182.html
I support the Whittemore-Pe
Hi Jason,
Jason Dunsmore writes:
> This patch fixed that export error, but I'm still seeing the problems
> with exporting #+TITLE: in an heading described at:
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/39100
You mean that, without any :html-preamble and with
̀org-export-html-preamble' se
Hello,
Frank Jäkel writes:
> * A
> I'm trying to fill this
> paragraph by pressing
> M-q now
>
> I get the following error:
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function fill-forward-paragraph)
> (fill-forward-paragraph -1)
> (save-excursion (fill-forward-paragraph -1) (setq itemp
> (org-
Hi Leo,
Leo writes:
> I installed org-mode 7.5 with emacs-23 and found that links are no
> longer in purple but blue, like this:
>
> http://imgur.com/LEkZt.png
>
> It looks confusing to me. Any idea whether this is a bug?
It is not: in Org 7.5 (vs 7.4), org-link face is inherited from link
f
Patch 672 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/672/) is now "Accepted".
Maintainer comment: none
This relates to the following submission:
http://mid.gmane.org/%3C86ei6eoq4l.fsf%40thinkpad.colorado%3E
Here is the original message containing the patch:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ut
Rodrigo Lazo writes:
> I found a trivial error with this docstring.
Applied, thanks.
--
Bastien
On 03/10/2011 05:05 AM, Bastien wrote:
> So I naturally thought of something like an "Org Expert mode": when
> turned off, the UI would *not* give access to complex features and
> perhaps display more helpful messages on simple ones; when turned on,
> Org would have a less verbose UI (think of the
Hi all,
* A
I'm trying to fill this
paragraph by pressing
M-q now
I get the following error:
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function fill-forward-paragraph)
(fill-forward-paragraph -1)
(save-excursion (fill-forward-paragraph -1) (setq itemp
(org-in-item-p)))
(cond ((and ... ...) t) (t
Hi,
I found a trivial error with this docstring.
--8<---cut here---start->8---
diff --git a/lisp/org-exp.el b/lisp/org-exp.el
index dff86b6..34f101d 100644
--- a/lisp/org-exp.el
+++ b/lisp/org-exp.el
@@ -1042,7 +1042,7 @@ Pressing `1' will switch between these
Richard Riley writes:
> Bernt Hansen writes:
>
>> Richard Riley writes:
>>
>>> when I create an agenda matching a certain tag its not working for file
>>> level tags. Is this a known issue or have I done something wrong?
>>>
>>> (C-c a m)
>>>
>>> http://orgmode.org/manual/Setting-tags.html
>>>
On Thu, Mar 10 2011, Bastien wrote:
> I'm myself not convinced: it's a good thing that Org doesn't need an
> Expert mode so far, it means newbies are not confused by the UI, and
> experts are not frustrated by it either. But I expect neat features
> can emerge from the discussion.
I agree that
On Mar 10, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Richard Riley wrote:
> Bernt Hansen writes:
>
>> Richard Riley writes:
>>
>>> when I create an agenda matching a certain tag its not working for file
>>> level tags. Is this a known issue or have I done something wrong?
>>>
>>> (C-c a m)
>>>
>>> http://orgmode.o
If I define columns using a specification like
#+COLUMNS: %25ITEM(name) %25EMAIL(email)
then tags associated with the entries seem to appear in the ITEM column.
But if I include a TAGS entry in the column spec, like this:
#+COLUMNS: %25ITEM(name) %15TAGS %25EMAIL(email)
then tags show up only
Bernt Hansen writes:
> Richard Riley writes:
>
>> when I create an agenda matching a certain tag its not working for file
>> level tags. Is this a known issue or have I done something wrong?
>>
>> (C-c a m)
>>
>> http://orgmode.org/manual/Setting-tags.html
>>
>> file level tags:
>>
>> #+TAGS:
Thank you Bastien.
It works as expected.
--
Darlan
At Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:24:26 +0100,
Bastien wrote:
>
> Hi Darlan,
>
> Darlan Cavalcante Moreira writes:
>
> > I think yes and no, depending on what the user wants to do.
> >
> > I my case I use org-attach as a way to store files related to
Bastien writes:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Jason Dunsmore writes:
>
>> Bastien writes:
>>
>>> Hopefully this patch will solve a few issues that have just been raised
>>> about the new behavior of org-export-html-preamble/postamble.
>>
>> With this patch, I get the following error when exporting to HTML:
>
Richard Riley writes:
> when I create an agenda matching a certain tag its not working for file
> level tags. Is this a known issue or have I done something wrong?
>
> (C-c a m)
>
> http://orgmode.org/manual/Setting-tags.html
>
> file level tags:
>
> #+TAGS: laptop car pc sailboat
Hi Richard,
Juan/Richard: thanks for the suggestions. I'll try these when I'm home
on the Mac. Perhaps I should have just been using C-d all along!
John
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Juan Pechiar wrote:
> Doing F1-k on backspace ("delete" key) gives:
>
> DEL (translated from ) runs the command
> delete
Sébastien Vauban
writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Richard Riley wrote:
>> when I create an agenda matching a certain tag its not working for file
>> level tags. Is this a known issue or have I done something wrong?
>>
>> (C-c a m)
>>
>> http://orgmode.org/manual/Setting-tags.html
>>
>> file level tags:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Bastien writes:
>>
>>> So I naturally thought of something like an "Org Expert mode": when
>>> turned off, the UI would *not* give access to complex features
>>
>> More precisely: the UI would not _display_ complex feat
John Hendy writes:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Richard Riley wrote:
>>
>> when I create an agenda matching a certain tag its not working for file
>> level tags. Is this a known issue or have I done something wrong?
>>
>> (C-c a m)
>>
>> http://orgmode.org/manual/Setting-tags.html
>>
>> fi
So maybe different custom functions that are developed to allow people to
use ORG in different ways. Some with more help for basic features, some for
GTD, some for publishing, some for advanced features or programming. All
of the features would always be available but maybe the suggest order for
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 7:41 AM, Richard Riley wrote:
>
> when I create an agenda matching a certain tag its not working for file
> level tags. Is this a known issue or have I done something wrong?
>
> (C-c a m)
>
> http://orgmode.org/manual/Setting-tags.html
>
> file level tags:
>
> #+TAGS: lapt
Hi Richard,
Richard Riley wrote:
> when I create an agenda matching a certain tag its not working for file
> level tags. Is this a known issue or have I done something wrong?
>
> (C-c a m)
>
> http://orgmode.org/manual/Setting-tags.html
>
> file level tags:
>
> #+TAGS: laptop car pc sailboat
It
If I have a buffer visiting one of my org-contacts files, say contacts.org,
and if I have turned on "column mode" in the buffer visiting
contacts.org via org-columns ("C-x C-x C-c")
then, when trying to tab-complete in a *Message* buffer
To: George
in the event that George identifies an entry
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Rustom Mody wrote:
> Bastien wrote:
>> I've just added the ability to run a custom function for bulk agenda actions
>> (thanks to Puneeth for the patch!) This is clearly for
>> power users -- or those who are willing to take the time to find functions
>> that we
when I create an agenda matching a certain tag its not working for file
level tags. Is this a known issue or have I done something wrong?
(C-c a m)
http://orgmode.org/manual/Setting-tags.html
file level tags:
#+TAGS: laptop car pc sailboat
regards
r.
Bastien wrote:
> I've just added the ability to run a custom function for bulk agenda actions
> (thanks to Puneeth for the patch!) This is clearly for
> power users -- or those who are willing to take the time to find functions
> that we might document in Worg.
> So I naturally thought of somet
Bastien writes:
> Hi clock-master,
>
> Bernt Hansen writes:
>
>> The following patch series fixes problems with with clocking in tasks and
>> setting the default clock task.
>
> I've applied these two patches -- thanks for catching this. I feel
> lucky that org-clock power users are also able
Doing F1-k on backspace ("delete" key) gives:
DEL (translated from ) runs the command
delete-backward-char
And with delete (Fn-"delete") it says:
DEL (translated from ) runs the command
delete-backward-char
So both are mapped to DEL.
You can fix this with
(global-set-key [kp-delete]
Matt Lundin writes:
> I use beamer for presentations and appreciate the fine-grained control
> over effects that it provides. For instance, I can combine overlay
> specifications with includegraphics to mix and match different text and
> images on the same frame.
>
> \begin{frame}
> \frametitle{A
Hello,
Here is a patch which allows one to change the (currently) hard-coded DIV name
in which the page contents is being inserted.
It currently is "content", but some prefer "container" or "wrapper".
If accepted, my next patch will be to make this a per-project variable.
diff --git a/lisp/org-
Wes Hardaker writes:
>> On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:46:50 +, Eric S Fraga
>> said:
>
> ESF> Are you intending to extend your code for not-so-appropriate fields? If
> ESF> so, I definitely would like to see the addresses converted and it would
> ESF> be quite useful to have the notes con
Bastien writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> So I naturally thought of something like an "Org Expert mode": when
>> turned off, the UI would *not* give access to complex features
>
> More precisely: the UI would not _display_ complex features, which will
> still be available anyway (of course).
I st
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> So I naturally thought of something like an "Org Expert mode": when
>> turned off, the UI would *not* give access to complex features
>
> More precisely: the UI would not _display_ complex features, which will
> still be avai
I wonder about the complexity associated with adding an expert mode.
My area is design, and one of my pet peeves about all things designed is how
they tend to increase in complexity for the sake of extending their scope,
without much attention being paid to the brittleness that accumulates
collater
Hi Darlan,
Darlan Cavalcante Moreira writes:
> I think yes and no, depending on what the user wants to do.
>
> I my case I use org-attach as a way to store files related to org that *I
> don't need to access outside org-mode*. For files that I access outside
> org-mode I don't attach it at all.
Hi there,
I installed org-mode 7.5 with emacs-23 and found that links are no
longer in purple but blue, like this:
http://imgur.com/LEkZt.png
It looks confusing to me. Any idea whether this is a bug? Thanks.
Leo
Bastien writes:
> So I naturally thought of something like an "Org Expert mode": when
> turned off, the UI would *not* give access to complex features
More precisely: the UI would not _display_ complex features, which will
still be available anyway (of course).
--
Bastien
Hi all,
Org tries to stay as simple/accessible as possible for newbie and as
complete/flexible as possible for power users.
The documentation and the UI are central for this: the documentation
should promote core features, document complex ones, and give pointers
on how to hack Org -- it does tha
Hello,
Using ob-template I created a minimal ob-xml (attached to this mail). In
my emacs config I added xml to org-babel-load-languages and nxml in
org-src-lang-modes. Everything works ok except a small glitch. The
tangled file always start with an empty line (not present in the babel
bloc). How c
Hi Puneeth,
Puneeth Chaganti writes:
> Here's a patch that allows choosing or specifying any arbitrary
> function to be used for Bulk actions from agenda view.
I have applied this patch now, thanks.
This led me to think about an Org "Expert" mode.
I'm writing a separate email to explain thi
Hi Bill,
Bill Jackson writes:
> This works for me.
thanks for testing.
> I have not tested it _carefully_, but I did apply your
> patch and my setup now works as it did before. (Of course :preamble and
> :postamble needed to be changed to :html-preamble :html-postamble for
> org-publish.)
Hi clock-master,
Bernt Hansen writes:
> The following patch series fixes problems with with clocking in tasks and
> setting the default clock task.
I've applied these two patches -- thanks for catching this. I feel
lucky that org-clock power users are also able to send patches :)
Best,
--
Hi Zhang,
Zhang Zhizhong writes:
> Did I miss something? Or did I just found a bug?
Please send a backtrace, it will help understand the error you have:
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html
Thanks!
--
Bastien
Hi Jason,
Jason Dunsmore writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Hopefully this patch will solve a few issues that have just been raised
>> about the new behavior of org-export-html-preamble/postamble.
>
> With this patch, I get the following error when exporting to HTML:
>
> list: Symbol's value as var
Patch 668 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/668/) is now "Accepted".
Maintainer comment: none
This relates to the following submission:
http://mid.gmane.org/%3C1299721221-10196-2-git-send-email-bernt%40norang.ca%3E
Here is the original message containing the patch:
> Content-Type: text/p
Patch 669 (http://patchwork.newartisans.com/patch/669/) is now "Accepted".
Maintainer comment: none
This relates to the following submission:
http://mid.gmane.org/%3C1299721221-10196-3-git-send-email-bernt%40norang.ca%3E
Here is the original message containing the patch:
> Content-Type: text/p
Hi Bastien,
Bastien wrote:
> Sébastien Vauban writes:
>>> Thanks for catching this -- I've applied a modified patch, yours add
>>> EXPORT_DATE twice :)
>>
>> Hein? Not sure what you're talking about...
>
> I'm talking about _nothing_ -- just misread your patch.
>
> Sorry for that!
Not a probl
michael hohn writes:
>>
>> I have pushed a fix for this case. Thanks for your report, it reminds me
>> filling in lists is still a bit fragile, and needs some care.
>>
> Thanks for the quick response! The list filling is very nice already.
Indeed -- and I cannot thank Nicolas enough for all the
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Fred Concklin wrote:
[..]
>
> [1] I assume they're running pandoc on the backend. However, there are a few
> shortcomings. For instance, the #+begin_src sh tag doesn't display as
> code on the web.
They use org-ruby. https://github.com/bdewey/org-ruby
-- Pun
Hi, Fred,
About Github's markup library and org plugin (not Pandoc), see
https://github.com/github/markup
If it's just the ascii-art representation of the directory tree you
want, you can wrap it in an example block. From your example:
#+BEGIN_EXAMPLE
.
|-- config.clj
`-- resources
|-
Hello,
Scot Becker writes:
> That sounds like it means that any documents you might want to export to
> LaTeX (and format with hard line breaks) should always have non-breaking
> spaces after the periods---or you should keep a manual eye on your paragraph
> formatting to make sure no numbers com
Hi all,
I'm Fred and I just joined the list.
I've been using github for a little bit and really like their parsing
of org-mode files on the web[1]. I was converting a markdown file to
org-mode wasn't able to figure out how to convert a directory
hierarchy from Md.
I've attac
79 matches
Mail list logo
