You got me! April Fools!
-- Clint (aka Carsten)
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Sven Bretfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The important point I would like to make here is that for all
> > intents and purposes, Org-mode *is* taskpaper!
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 04:58:51PM -0500, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
> I'm not sure how tolerant you mean. Would it help to use @-I and @-II
>
> Edd
>
By tolerant I mean not sensitive to absolute table references that
break if you use tab to add more rows at the bottom or C-k to kill
lines in betwe
Hi
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The important point I would like to make here is that for all
> intents and purposes, Org-mode *is* taskpaper!
Here is what I think: Carsten *is* Clint!
This was a very well planned, long prepared, identity-shifting and,
indeed, very nasty April
I'm not sure how tolerant you mean. Would it help to use @-I and @-II
Edd
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Russell Adams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 11:05:01AM -0500, Russell Adams wrote:
> > Speaking of tables today, I thought I'd post a question that I haven't
> > fo
On Apr 1, 2008, at 5:52 PM, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
To be honest, if I were looking for an outliner today as I was when I
found org-mode, I might have been scared off. Org-mode has gotten
very big.
Sometimes I am wondering: what do you mean when it has gotten big?
How do you measure it?
One
Before I was aware of org-mode, I developed this small superkaramba
timer application which would display which task I was working on, when
I started it, how much time was left, and also the current time. I've
attached a snapshot of that app to this email.
Now I'm using org-mode extensively wh
Has anyone out there set up a system to automatically create org entries
to journal outgoing emails to certain individuals? Ideally based on a
bbdb entry to journal that particular contact?
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to
Hi everyone,
Last week I decided I want to keep history of my org-mode file changes.
I've accidentally lost things in the past when editing folded regions
and this gives me a way to get back to the old version without requiring
any extra steps during my normal work.
--
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 11:05:01AM -0500, Russell Adams wrote:
> Speaking of tables today, I thought I'd post a question that I haven't
> found a simple answer for.
>
> How do you sum a table reliably? (ie: tolerant of editing)
>
> This table requires the use of org-table-insert-row (etc...) in o
Speaking of tables today, I thought I'd post a question that I haven't
found a simple answer for.
How do you sum a table reliably? (ie: tolerant of editing)
This table requires the use of org-table-insert-row (etc...) in order
to keep the formula correct.
| Header |
||
| 1 |
|
To be honest, if I were looking for an outliner today as I was when I
found org-mode, I might have been scared off. Org-mode has gotten
very big. But as you said, the easy things are easy. There are a
great many feature in org-mode that I have not used nor have I had
time to learn to use. They
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Clint Laskowski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My thoughtful suggestion has become the brunt of an April Fool's Joke?
> I have half a mind to report you all to the Productivity Police! Fine!
> I'm going back to paper and pencil for to-do lists, and mail, too!
> We'l
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 12:28:37PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I hope that you will all forgive me my little joke. It worked so
> well because there is a certain amount of truth in the matter, of
> course, and I would like to address this in a more serious
> manner.
You got
Dear Carsten,
I was terribly shocked for about 18 seconds - my brain storming through
thoughts about protesting and forking the project and what else...
But as I am too convinced of the useful features of Org it became clear in a
moment
Next year same day will be a very interesting date to loo
--- Bastien Guerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> what would be
> Emacs without its tutorial? A closed door.
>
> So I believe this would be a *huge* benefit for Org
> to have its own tutorial.
Is it an april fool? <[°]=,=<
Let's assume it isn't.
I disagree since I belive the manual is
My thoughtful suggestion has become the brunt of an April Fool's Joke?
I have half a mind to report you all to the Productivity Police! Fine!
I'm going back to paper and pencil for to-do lists, and mail, too!
We'll see how you like that!
:-)
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL
Dear all,
I hope that you will all forgive me my little joke. It worked so
well because there is a certain amount of truth in the matter, of
course, and I would like to address this in a more serious
manner.
Org-mode has indeed become very feature-rich in the run of the
years. However, while
Hm,
Message from Apr 01 2008 (11:18):
> Hm, reading all the answers to this aprils fools gets me a bit worried.
> Nobody seems to see the joke and everybody seems to agree that org-mode
> is too bloated.
sometimes the joke reveals a truth. Sometimes only the reflection of a
truth. Let's wait unt
"Egli Christian (KIRO 433)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hm, reading all the answers to this aprils fools gets me a bit
> worried. Nobody seems to see the joke and everybody seems to agree
> that org-mode is too bloated.
:)
I know TaskPaper for quite a long time. A Mac-friend of mine sent me
"Egli Christian (KIRO 433)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> the recent discussion about Taskpaper in the thread started by
>> Clint Laskowski has made me realize how much we have lost out way
>> with Org-mode. Org-mode was once a compact and easy tool just like
>> taskpaper. In fact, looking at th
> the recent discussion about Taskpaper in the thread started
> by Clint Laskowski has made me realize how much we have lost
> out way with Org-mode. Org-mode was once a compact and
> easy tool just like taskpaper. In fact, looking at the
> features of taskpaper, one might think that they had an
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Carsten,
> I hope that you can all agree with my conclusion. If not, than I am
> confident that with time you will realize just how important today's
> decision was.
I do agree with you. I only use a tiny subset of org's features:
Outlining, TODOs
--- Russell Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha
scritto:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 09:26:49AM +0200, Carsten
> Dominik wrote:
> > Org-mode was once a
> compact and
> > easy tool just like taskpaper.
[...]
> > I have now come to the conclusion that we need to
> turn
> > the tide and downscope Org-mode
Carsten,
Message from Apr 01 2008 (09:26):
> Reading this thread has really cost me a lot of sleep, but
> I have now come to the conclusion that we need to turn
> the tide and downscope Org-mode significantly.
this is what I wrote to you some months ago. Some say it is a symbol of
success when a
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 09:26:49AM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> the recent discussion about Taskpaper in the thread started
> by Clint Laskowski has made me realize how much we have lost
> out way with Org-mode. Org-mode was once a compact and
> easy tool just like taskpaper.
Dear all,
the recent discussion about Taskpaper in the thread started
by Clint Laskowski has made me realize how much we have lost
out way with Org-mode. Org-mode was once a compact and
easy tool just like taskpaper. In fact, looking at the
features of taskpaper, one might think that they had
26 matches
Mail list logo
