On 10/8/07, Russell Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:35:33PM -0500, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
> > I'm now at the point that I have several such projects in flight that
> > can block one another. One thing I think I'm eventually going to have
> > to do is replace my checkb
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:35:33PM -0500, Eddward DeVilla wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Russell Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In projects, my sections are
> - quick info -- a table with things like defect or request
> tracking info, start date, estimated time, date testing begins and
> date actua
On 10/8/07, John Wiegley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about just having generalized Lisp triggers:
[snip]
This could be dangerous. Org file are (most) text. The more code you
allow to be embedded, the more of a vector org-mode becomes for trojan
horse attacks. Of course I've been using lisp
On 10/8/07, Russell Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I love this discussion on properties for dependencies, but does anyone
> have a suggestion on how to visualize it?
>
> After you setup all these triggers, you still need a central place to
> view the overview and steps involved (I'm thinking pr
Hi,
I have not followed very closely on the "dependency" thread that is hot
now. But I guess my wish here probably relates to it. The feature I wish
for is:
When a TODO item is marked "DONE", all TODO items under that tree are
automatically marked as "DONE". More generically, the user should
Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We could use the TODO keywords instead of "SEND" as a way to say that
> reaching a particular todo state should trigger some kind of action.
How about just having generalized Lisp triggers:
:PROPERTIES:
:TRIGGER: (lambda (previous new)
(if
I'm not sure we are talking about the same things really.
On 10/8/07, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Eddward DeVilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > My only real issue is that I tend to think of task dependencies in
> > terms of the other tasks a given task is waiting on rather than what
Russell Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I love this discussion on properties for dependencies, but does anyone
> have a suggestion on how to visualize it?
Building a sparse tree with headlines that are affected by actions
possibily triggered from the current task?
> After you setup all these
I love this discussion on properties for dependencies, but does anyone
have a suggestion on how to visualize it?
After you setup all these triggers, you still need a central place to
view the overview and steps involved (I'm thinking project management
specifically).
My most common use of org is
Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I start to export org to icalendar and then to google calendar. I
> wonder what's the best way to include the LOCATION.
What do you exactly mean by "include the LOCATION"?
--
Bastien
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
"Eddward DeVilla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My only real issue is that I tend to think of task dependencies in
> terms of the other tasks a given task is waiting on rather than what
> other tasks are waiting on a given task.
Ok, then:
* Task A
* Task B
:PROPERTIES:
:>TODO: {TODO 'previ
Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> - if A changes to DONE, change B from BLOCKED to NEXT
> (this is the obvious one)
>
> - if A changes to DONE, change B from NEXT to CANCELLED
> (if only A or B needs to be done, not both)
>
> There must be others people can think of easily.
Up
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:17:52AM -0400, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
> Bernt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> - The clocktable has a new `:scope' parameter.
> >
> > Cool! :) So now I can split my files again and still get a daily
> > su
On 10/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I had wondered if there was any value in wrapping the html export in
> > sections to match the structure of the org file.
> >
[ snip ]
> I have not yet used this feature, but I am working wi
On 10/8/07, Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Implementing tasks-dependencies sounds pretty exciting!
>
> I'd like to jump in this discussion with a very simple idea.
>
> ,
> | * TODO When this task is marked done, send SCHEDULED to the next task
> | :PROPERTIES:
> | :SEND: {SCHEDULED 'n
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:55:12PM +0100, Bastien wrote:
> Implementing tasks-dependencies sounds pretty exciting!
Yes, I've been wanting this too.
> I'd like to jump in this discussion with a very simple idea.
>
> ,
> | * TODO When this task is marked done, send SCHEDULED to the next task
>
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 09:48:28PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On Oct 8, 2007, at 15:52, Russell Adams wrote:
>
> >I know I'm replying to myself, but I had an idea.
> >
> >If a link could show the state of a linked TODO, that would make for a
> >good visualization. I could then follow the l
On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 11:25:00 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have not yet used this feature, but I am working with html/css all
> day, so here is my opinion:
>
> 1. You shouldn't use more divs than you need to, and you don't need
> them.
>
Why (I'm sure there's a good reason)?
> 2. You shoul
Implementing tasks-dependencies sounds pretty exciting!
I'd like to jump in this discussion with a very simple idea.
,
| * TODO When this task is marked done, send SCHEDULED to the next task
| :PROPERTIES:
| :SEND: {SCHEDULED 'next "+1d"} {TODO 'next "TODO"}
| :END:
|
| * When previous
On Oct 8, 2007, at 15:52, Russell Adams wrote:
I know I'm replying to myself, but I had an idea.
If a link could show the state of a linked TODO, that would make for a
good visualization. I could then follow the link and just adjust my
order to account for dependencies. It sounds like a more "
Hi there,
I start to export org to icalendar and then to google calendar. I wonder
what's the best way to include the LOCATION.
Thanks,
--
.: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: [ GPG Key: 9283AA3F ] :.
Use the most powerful email client -- http://gnus.org/
__
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why do you think this is better?
Because if I am on a thursday and I go a week forward or backward it
makes more sense to still be on a thursday IMO. Just a gut feeling and
how it works on pretty much any calendar app I have used. No big thing I
grant
Why do you think this is better?
- Carsten
On Oct 5, 2007, at 22:54, Richard G Riley wrote:
IMO it would be nice if when using left/right in the agenda view, the
cursor stays on the same day of the week as opposed to moving to the
top
of the screen.
___
On Oct 6, 2007, at 9:46, Maxim Loginov wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Oct 5, 2007, at 13:54, Maxim Loginov wrote:
is there any mechanism to untag subtree?
No, that is not possible. As a work-around, can create an
additonal tag "nopython" and then craft your sear
Hi Fabian,
properties are currently *not* inherited, at least in general they are
not. This would cause a large overhead in searching.
Having said that, I do use inheritance for a couple of special
properties, so your expectation is not surprising. Maybe I
should allow inheritance with a va
On Oct 7, 2007, at 17:25, Robert Miesen wrote:
==BEGIN BUG REPORT==
I attempted to mark a task with the REPEAT timestamp as 'DONE' using
'C-c C-t'
and instead of the schedule timestamp for the task being moved
according to the
value within REPEAT() (ex.--- REPEAT(+1w)), it sim
On Oct 7, 2007, at 14:27, Bastien wrote:
If Carsten implements this, I think all the search facilities in Org
will need a bit of uniformization/clarification.
Admittedly the search functions are one of the areas that
demonstrate most clearly how Org-mode has grown and evolved,
adding little t
Hi Carsten,
Another *really* easy feature request: when it says
# Insert note for state change, finish with C-c C-c, or cancel with C-u C-c C-c.
could you change it so it says *which* state you're going to? Of
course, an intelligent user should be able to remember which button
they just pressed
I've been waiting to see if org might develop something like todo
dependency ordering. Seems like one could use this with and estimated
time to complete a todo item to generate a milestone table or more
easily estimate how long a group of tasks will require to complete or
when the soonest a gi
I know I'm replying to myself, but I had an idea.
If a link could show the state of a linked TODO, that would make for a
good visualization. I could then follow the link and just adjust my
order to account for dependencies. It sounds like a more "permanent"
agenda view that you could edit to get t
Lets make that more generic. How do you organize your dependencies
anyway? The basic hierarchy can't always be setup in order.
One of the things I'd considered is an optional GUID property for each
todo, and then a DEPENDS property with the GUID of any (potentially
multiple?) dependencies.
There'
On 10/8/07, Rainer Stengele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Having a TODO which depends on an earlier TODO I would like to trigger the
> timestamped scheduling of
> the following TODO when the former is DONE.
I second this request. I often like to schedule a workflow where task
A must prece
On 10/6/07, Mike Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had wondered if there was any value in wrapping the html export in
> sections to match the structure of the org file.
Classes, classes! :)
--
With best regards,
Dmitri Minaev
Russian history blog: http://minaev.blogspot.com
On Oct 8, 2007, at 14:39, Bastien wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Arrrgh!
make that (org-buffer-property-keys t) for now, bug fix in next
release.
This patch is also needed:
Indeed, thanks a lot. So to make this simpler, here is
the modified version that should work o
applied, thanks.
- Carsten
On Oct 6, 2007, at 22:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
This tiny patch (against org version 5.10b, i didnt found a suitable
CVS repository to get non-released code) fixes `org-store-link' for
wanderlust summary mode.
In both the latest wanderlust version (2.14.0
On Oct 8, 2007, at 12:54, Bastien wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here is a first attempt at such a function, comments are welcome!
Maybe we should bind this function to `C-c /', instead of org-occur?
Yes, this binding would be okay, unless there are lots of people using
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is a first attempt at such a function, comments are welcome!
> Maybe we should bind this function to `C-c /', instead of org-occur?
Yes, this binding would be okay, unless there are lots of people using
org-occur out there.
And `org-sparse-tree'
John Wiegley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bastien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> 1. Search for a regexp
>> 2. Search for a complex query
>> 3. Prompt interactively for a complex query
>> 4. Show all tagged entries
>> 5. Prompt for a specific tag
>> 6. Prompt for a specific tag (restricting to T
On Oct 7, 2007, at 14:27, Bastien wrote:
If Carsten implements this, I think all the search facilities in Org
will need a bit of uniformization/clarification.
Admittedly the search functions are one of the areas that
demonstrate most clearly how Org-mode has grown and evolved, adding
little t
On Oct 7, 2007, at 11:14, John Wiegley wrote:
Ok, I have 147k of archived todos and notes now. Some are tagged,
some are
not. Most have an ARCHIVE_CATEGORY property (ever since Carsten so
kindly
implemented it).
My desire: To hit C-u C-c \ and have it prompt me for the "entity" its
going
On Oct 8, 2007, at 0:23, Wanrong Lin wrote:
Hi,
The agenda timeline view does not show any "SCHEDULED" todo items, but
does show items with an plain active time stamp without preceding
"SCHEDULED". Is that a bug or by design? If that is by design, what is
the rationale here? Thanks a lot fo
41 matches
Mail list logo
