Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is a first attempt at such a function, comments are welcome!
> Maybe we should bind this function to `C-c /', instead of org-occur?
Yes, this binding would be okay, unless there are lots of people using
org-occur out there.
And `org-sparse-tree' should match both John request and what I called
(in such a bombastic manner) a "universal" search interface.
There is a problem with (org-buffer-property-keys t t). Here is the
backtrace:
,----
| Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument symbolp ("TODO" "TAGS"
"ALLTAGS" "DEADLINE" "SCHEDULED" "CLOCK" "PRIORITY" "Release"
"Incompatible_ALL" "Elapsed_time" "Location" "LOCATION_ALL" "People_ALL"
"COLUMNS" "LOCATION" "CATEGORY" "ARCHIVE"))
| add-to-list(("TODO" "TAGS" "ALLTAGS" "DEADLINE" "SCHEDULED" "CLOCK"
"PRIORITY" "Release" "Incompatible_ALL" "Elapsed_time" "Location"
"LOCATION_ALL" "People_ALL" "COLUMNS" "LOCATION" "CATEGORY" "ARCHIVE")
"CATEGORY")
| org-buffer-property-keys(t t)
| eval((org-buffer-property-keys t t))
| eval-expression((org-buffer-property-keys t t) nil)
| call-interactively(eval-expression)
`----
--
Bastien
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
