On Jun 18, 2006, at 9:59, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jun 17, 2006, at 22:47, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
I have just one final thoughtand it's just a thought because I
don't understand how org-mode is implemented
What if, instead of archiving *moving* subtrees, it l
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jun 17, 2006, at 22:47, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
I have just one final thoughtand it's just a thought because I
don't understand how org-mode is implemented
What if, instead of archiving *moving* subtrees, it left them in place
but *hid* them in a semi-permanent
Hi Daniel,
thanks for taking the time to discuss this through.
On Jun 17, 2006, at 22:47, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
OK, so now we've come full circle -- this is very nearly the current
behavior, except instead of archiving the whole subtree, it would only
archive DONE entries from within the su
