https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31439
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #1
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:04:05PM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
> Added a new function dwfl_set_offline_next_addres which will set said
> field from the Dwfl struct. This is a requirement for listing functions
> from their addresses when using libdwfl offline, otherwise wrong
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31103
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at klomp dot org
--- Comment #3
Oh hi Mark!
On 3/2/24 17:47, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:04:05PM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
Added a new function dwfl_set_offline_next_addres which will set said
field from the Dwfl struct. This is a requirement for listing functions
from their addre
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31439
--- Comment #2 from rudi at heitbaum dot com ---
(In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #1)
> I don't fully understand how you are building, and I cannot replicate, but
> it seems something goes wrong with readelf.c using the libdwP.h "interna
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31439
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Hi Martin,
On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 07:43:38PM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
> On 3/2/24 17:47, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:04:05PM -0300, Martin Rodriguez Reboredo wrote:
> >>Added a new function dwfl_set_offline_next_addres which will set said
> >>field from the D
On 3/2/24 21:05, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi Martin,
[...]
It would be interesting to see the perf tool patch. I don't understand
the use case. So I assume perf currently does something which is wrong
and with your patch calling this new dwfl_set_offline_next_addres it
will do the right thing. That
