Bryan,
Did we address these issues to your satisfaction for clbuild?
I just promoted a patch to our elephant-unstable branch (soon to be
the main release) that provides a restart to create a my-config.sexp
file. If the user isn't warned explicitly, the consequences of a
default my-config
However, the first problem may require some creativity.
It seems to me the best we could hope for is to modify our build to
use our standard template,
"config.sexp", if my-config.sexp doesn't exist, and blare a warning
that you probably should
understand and set those defaults yourself. If w
Dear Bryan and Team,
I have now removed the explicit load of cl-sql (I think) and put an
sbcl pragma around an explicit depend in both the "elephant" darcs
branch and the "elephant-unstable" darcs branch.
I observe the following comments in the CLBUILD wnpp-projects file,
w
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 08:42 -0400, Ian Eslick wrote:
> #+sbcl :sb-posix is the way to go.
>
> I hadn't realized that SBCL didn't include that by default like the
> rest of the lisps. Easy fix!
>
> Robert, any indication as to the source of your clsql errors?
I will look into tonight, when
#+sbcl :sb-posix is the way to go.
I hadn't realized that SBCL didn't include that by default like the
rest of the lisps. Easy fix!
Robert, any indication as to the source of your clsql errors?
Removing the explicit load is good and looks easy. I'll let you check
these fixes in.
Als
RLR> (:depeonds-on ) expressions without dependence on SBCL? Can we just
RLR> use a compiler pragma like:
RLR> :depends-on (:uffi
RLR> #+sbcl :sb-posix
RLR> :cl-base64))
sure
RLR> in our asdf files? If so we will have to do something similar for
RLR> each supported system (see os.lisp):
R
I'm not a master of anything, but pragmas seem to be the approach used in
hunchentoot (see below).
(asdf:defsystem :hunchentoot
:serial t
:version #.*hunchentoot-version*
:depends-on (:chunga
:cl-base64
:cl-fad
:cl-ppcre
#-(or :li
On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 14:22 -0700, Bryan Emrys wrote:
> At one point the clbuild maintainers looked at elephant but had some problems
> that prevented inclusion.
>
> Specifically:
>
> # - needs sb-posix, but doesn't declare that dependency, meaning that
> #it doesn't build even with a confi