I'm not a master of anything, but pragmas seem to be the approach used in
hunchentoot (see below).
(asdf:defsystem :hunchentoot
:serial t
:version #.*hunchentoot-version*
:depends-on (:chunga
:cl-base64
:cl-fad
:cl-ppcre
#-(or :lispworks :hunchentoot-no-ssl) :cl+ssl
:md5
:rfc2388
#+:sbcl :sb-bsd-sockets
#+:sbcl :sb-posix
:url-rewrite)
:components ((:file "packages")
(:file "conditions")
#+:allegro (:file "port-acl")
#+:clisp (:file "port-clisp")
#+:cmu (:file "port-cmu")
#+:lispworks (:file "port-lw")
#+:openmcl (:file "port-mcl")
#+:sbcl (:file "port-sbcl")
(:file "specials")
(:file "mime-types")
(:file "util")
(:file "log")
(:file "cookie")
(:file "reply")
(:file "request")
(:file "session")
(:file "misc")
(:file "easy-handlers")
(:file "headers")
#+(and :allegro :unix) (:file "unix-acl")
#+(and :clisp :unix) (:file "unix-clisp")
#+(and :cmu :unix) (:file "unix-cmu")
#+(and :lispworks :unix) (:file "unix-lw")
#+(and :openmcl :unix) (:file "unix-mcl")
#+(and :sbcl :unix (not :win32)) (:file "unix-sbcl")
(:file "server")))
Bryan
On Sunday 11 May 2008 05:12:16 pm Robert L. Read wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 14:22 -0700, Bryan Emrys wrote:
> > At one point the clbuild maintainers looked at elephant but had some
> > problems that prevented inclusion.
> >
> > Specifically:
> >
> > # - needs sb-posix, but doesn't declare that dependency, meaning that
> > # it doesn't build even with a config file
> > # - ele-clsql loads clsql from the .asd file, not using :depends-on,
> > # which is completely unacceptable
> > # (we blacklist ele-clsql in clbuild.lisp because of that)
> >
> > Did anyone ever respond?
>
> Dear Bryan,
> Thanks for calling this to our attention. I doubt anyone ever
> responded to our being blacklisted, as I have no recollection of it.
>
> I have removed the explicit load, and my tests are red but I doubt that
> was the problem.
>
> I am not a master of ASDF --- can someone (Bryan?) tell me how we can
> integrate the fact that we depend on sb-posix into the ASDF
> (:depeonds-on ) expressions without dependence on SBCL? Can we just use
> a compiler pragma like:
>
> :depends-on (:uffi
> #+sbcl :sb-posix
> :cl-base64))
>
>
>
> in our asdf files? If so we will have to do something similar for
> each supported system (see os.lisp):
>
>
> (defmacro in-directory ((dir) &body body)
> `(progn
> (#+sbcl sb-posix:chdir
> #+cmu unix:unix-chdir
> #+allegro excl:chdir
> #+lispworks hcl:change-directory
> #+openmcl ccl:cwd
> ,dir)
> ,@body))
>
> Finally, our documentation build system, make-ref.lisp, seems to be more
> deeply SBCL dependent than anything in Elephant; but that doesn't hurt
> much, as we normally build and publish the documentation with each
> release anyway. I wonder if we could just make the documentation build
> a separate package, in order to satisfy the clbuild requirements?
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > elephant-devel site list
> > elephant-devel@common-lisp.net
> > http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> elephant-devel site list
> elephant-devel@common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
>
_______________________________________________
elephant-devel site list
elephant-devel@common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
