Nevermind. I went back and tested some assumptions I was making back
when I was still learning the MOP and found them not to hold, so I
think I have a cleaner solution now.
Thanks for the prompting Pierre!
Ian
On Mar 30, 2007, at 6:30 PM, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
Scribit Ian Eslick dies 30/
Scribit Ian Eslick dies 30/03/2007 hora 13:22:
> Is there a way to implement class keyword arguments in a metaclass?
What do you mean?
> ensure-class-using-class will fail if it gets a keyword argument it
> doesn't recognize
Strange, because its signature includes &allow-other-keys...
Curiously
Is there a way to implement class keyword arguments in a metaclass?
ensure-class-using-class will fail if it gets a keyword argument it
doesn't recognize, but :around methods on that function for the class
argument (eql nil) flags warnings or errors. Since the MOP doesn't
know the class at
