On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Alex Mizrahi wrote:
> Anyway ,if you are the only one who reads this list and can push patches
>> then no one will answer your question, because you are the only one
>> qualified to answer it :)
>>
>
> Not all questions require qualifications...
> It looks like we
Anyway ,if you are the only one who reads this list and can push patches
then no one will answer your question, because you are the only one
qualified to answer it :)
Not all questions require qualifications...
It looks like we have enough people here who can participate in
discussions, it is j
I missed the earlier patch from Red somehow. I do follow the Elephant list and
am more than happy to grow the crew of people who can do patching. Alex, I'll
ask to get you perms for Elephant on cl.net. Anyone else interested in pushing
to Elephant directly? The more the merrier.
Thanks,
Ian
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Alex Mizrahi wrote:
> This does not appear to have been pushed yet--are there any objections
>> to the patch?
>>
>
> It looks like nobody who can push patches reads this mailing list anymore.
>
> So, well, maybe I should take over maintainership after all?
>
> I th
This does not appear to have been pushed yet--are there any objections
to the patch?
It looks like nobody who can push patches reads this mailing list anymore.
So, well, maybe I should take over maintainership after all?
___
elephant-devel site list
This does not appear to have been pushed yet--are there any objections to
the patch?
The patch seems to fix metaobject protocol issues. Does anybody object to
moving Elephant over to use Closer to MOP? We could avoid this sort of bug
in the future
Red
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Nikodemu
*cough* attached...
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus
-- Forwarded message --
From: Nikodemus Siivola
Date: 29 March 2011 08:33
Subject: Elephant patch for current SBCL
To: quickl...@googlegroups.com, elephant-devel@common-lisp.net,
ablumb...@common-lisp.net, rr...@common-lisp.net,
iesl...@
