On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Alex Mizrahi <alex.mizr...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Anyway ,if you are the only one who reads this list and can push patches >> then no one will answer your question, because you are the only one >> qualified to answer it :) >> > > Not all questions require qualifications... > It looks like we have enough people here who can participate in > discussions, it is just that they're not willing to take responsibility of > doing a code review and actually pushing a patch. I'm not a big fan of it > either :) > > My mistake then. In your comment: "It looks like nobody who can push patches reads this mailing list anymore", I just translated "can" to "is technically able to" , not "is willing to". > BTW it looks like I've fixed with class updates, derived and inherited > indices. I didn't change a lot, but from my own experience change is > dramatic: it just wasn't working before and it works now. I'm going to test > it a bit more, though. > > db-postmodern also got a cheap pset implementation so set-valued slots can > be used now. > > Ian> Alex, I'll ask to get you perms for Elephant on cl.net. > > Cool, thanks. > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > elephant-devel site list > elephant-devel@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/**mailman/listinfo/elephant-**devel<http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel> >
_______________________________________________ elephant-devel site list elephant-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/elephant-devel
