Re: [elephant-devel] BDB stores don't work on my 32-bit Debian box either

2009-11-14 Thread Ian Eslick
>> No I think this particular compilation has already been completed >> at this point. >> [...] >> Not sure about that. We need a backtrace, and please show us your >> bdb-constants.lisp. > > I have a third machine (an x86 32-bit Debian VPS) and I've finally got > elephant-1.0 to work with a patc

Re: [elephant-devel] BDB stores don't work on my 32-bit Debian box either

2009-11-14 Thread Sebastian Tennant
Quoth Henrik Hjelte : > You could perhaps try to remove all fasl and generated files I've been doing that all along. > and recompile with an older sbcl version. Sbcl can have bugs sometimes. This is what I'm going to do. Thanks for the suggestion. I despaired at the thought initially but then

Re: [elephant-devel] BDB stores don't work on my 32-bit Debian box either

2009-11-14 Thread Sebastian Tennant
Quoth "Leslie P. Polzer" : > CFFI is younger than UFFI and works in a different way. They provide an > incomplete UFFI compatibility layer, though. Thanks for the clarification. > [Luís is] one of the primary [CFFI] developers I think. But that doesn't mean > that he's able [...] to do this work.

Re: [elephant-devel] "file is not of required architecture"

2009-11-14 Thread Sebastian Tennant
Quoth "Leslie P. Polzer" : >> Berkeley DB error #22: Invalid argument >> [Condition of type BDB-DB-ERROR] > Try again after removing libmemutil.so (thus causing Elephant to rebuild it). It fails before this file is built, i.e., there is no libmemutil.so. Instead, there's a strange directory