Rico,
The problem is that currently the theme is shared for all users, so you
would need admin privileges to adjust this. Definitely not desirable.
I've filed the bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/plank/+bug/1053801
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Rico Tzschichholz wrote:
> Cassidy,
>
> Pla
Cassidy,
Plank doesn't actually support hiding the indicators. What I meant is if
elementary decides to hide them then there should be a way to unhide
them if needed. Which means the shell-plug would have to provide such an
option (toggle between a reasonable indicator size and 0)
Am 2012-09-20 1
Rico,
Functionally that's the same, sure. But I think the idea is that it should
be a setting instead of a theming hack. Users should be able to say, "I
want to display running indicators" and flip a switch to do so.
On Sep 20, 2012 10:44 AM, "Rico Tzschichholz" wrote:
> Setting the size to 0 is
Setting the size to 0 is fairly the same as having them disabled. So I
don't really see the need in such an extra key, although adding one is
easy. If you insist please file an elementary-tagged bug.
Rico
Am 20.09.2012 01:49, schrieb Daniel Foré:
> Well the idea is that our default apps already m
Just to add something, indicators are also useful to show that an app has
requested your attention while you were away (for example, if you were
pinged on irc), so I'd say the red one should remain. About "normal" ones I
agree with shnatsel, let's keep them till we can provide a real no-minimize
en
+1 on this and +1 on de-branded names on apps.
On September 19, 2012 at 8:00 PM Sam Tate wrote:
> In the long run (L+1 or even L+2), I want there to be no difference between
> an open and closed app
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
Post to : elementary-
Well the idea is that our default apps already more-or-less behave like
this and we're kind of pushing 3rd party devs to follow along.
But it sounds like overall there is a pretty strong desire for the option
to re-enable them for now. Which I think is 100% fair considering we're in
the very begin
I'm sorry, please disregard the previous message.
--
Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff
OS architect @ elementary
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
Post to : elementary-dev-community@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~elementary-dev-community
More
2012/9/19 Craig
> Isn't that kind of like pulling all street signs/traffic lights in excited
> anticipation for the day when cars have traffic data projected onto the
> windshield via HUD?
>
Gala's workspace management provides a sufficient alternative right now.
But in the long run BFQ and
http
Isn't that kind of like pulling all street signs/traffic lights in excited
anticipation for the day when cars have traffic data projected onto the
windshield via HUD?
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Sam Tate wrote:
> In the long run (L+1 or even L+2), I want there to be no difference
> between
In the long run (L+1 or even L+2), I want there to be no difference between
an open and closed app. Computers are fast enough now (esp. with Luna) that
you don't really notice the extra delay when you open an app rather than
restoring from Minimize.
I also want apps to save their state for when you
+1 on running app indicators unless a simple, _mouse only_ expose for app
windows is available (e.g. long hover over dock icon exposing running
screens). There are useful apps that don't support tabs and, even for
those that do, you may still want to run multiple windows with different
parameters
Ill have to think on that more, but on first thought I think it's a good
idea to indicate them on the launcher as the presence of a running app
changes the behavior of that particular launcher. (Launching a new window
versus focusing on an existing one).
Spatial concerns can be addressed by using
> Luna is so good on resources that it hardly matters if an app is open or not
> and you can easily see if something is open from Gala's Workspace Overview
> since minimize isn't part of our regular workflow.
Its not a matter of resources but of usability. When ever i have more
windows/applicat
2012/9/18 satch...@gmail.com
> +1. In fact, I'd go one step further and propose that elementary take the
> lead in adopting the (IMO, much needed) one-application-one-window
> paradigm. Things get incredibly confusing and cluttered with a whole mess
> of windows. If not, the minimise/unminimise t
+1. In fact, I'd go one step further and propose that elementary take the
lead in adopting the (IMO, much needed) one-application-one-window
paradigm. Things get incredibly confusing and cluttered with a whole mess
of windows. If not, the minimise/unminimise thing makes most sense (though,
again, w
2012/9/18 Cody Garver
> I end up with 3 or 4 browser windows with the same tabs open because I
> lose them. Maybe this could be avoided if Plank un-minimized windows on
> icon click instead of keeping them minimized.
>
+1, I'd like Plank to switch windows instead of minimizing them on clicking
t
I end up with 3 or 4 browser windows with the same tabs open because I lose
them. Maybe this could be avoided if Plank un-minimized windows on icon
click instead of keeping them minimized.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Sergey "Shnatsel" Davidoff <
ser...@elementaryos.org> wrote:
> I'd prefer
I'd prefer to keep the indicators for now. I'd be glad to personally send
them to /dev/null as soon as we have
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/elementaryos/+spec/memory-lending, but
until that's done I have to keep my eyes open for memory and I/O hogs, even
with zramswap. Since expo shows only win
I've been using Luna for quite a bit and i would love to have the option to
see the indicators..sometimes it's easier and quicker to just reveal the
dock than using the window switcher (i personally don't like hotcorners,i
really hate it when i accidentally activate them..)..plus,choice is always
g
Hey Guys,
I've seen a few mails/reports about the current lack of running app
indicators in Luna. I wanted to get a feel for how people who have been
using Luna for a while feel about it. Namely, is this something people are
complaining about because they expect it and aren't used to it yet, or is
21 matches
Mail list logo
