Re: [rc2]

Hi Daniel, Thanks for trying all that. Great to hear no regressions detected, congrats. I published the reports online at https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/ecl/ecl-diff-16.1.2-rc4-lin-x64-lisp-to-c.html https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/ecl/ecl-diff-16.1.2-rc4-lin-x64-byteco

Re: [rc2]

I've finnaly managed to run the test grid and compare the results \o/ :-) I've investigated the differences (potential regressions) by hand, and it seems that they behave the same on both ECL versions (short summary): | | 16.0.0-c | 16.1.2-c |

Re: [rc2]

16.02.2016, 23:09, "Daniel Kochmański" : > OK, thanks. I think I have something wrong with my setup because I can't > load the crashed packages even from SBCL or CCL (problems with > hu.dwim.*). How do you test that, via cl-test-grid or in REPL? > I'll create a fresh user account, download test

Re: [rc2]

OK, thanks. I think I have something wrong with my setup because I can't load the crashed packages even from SBCL or CCL (problems with hu.dwim.*). I'll create a fresh user account, download testgrid and run it (with a new rc tag), I hope it will work OK... Regards, Daniel Anton Vodonosov writes:

Re: [rc2]

16.02.2016, 18:30, "Daniel Kochmański" : > Is there a way to pick the results if the commit and version name were > the same? I've re-run the tests on my localhost machine, but the > generated report uses results from the previous run. If not, I'll re-run > the tests with the dummy -rc4 tag.. I'

Re: [rc2]

Is there a way to pick the results if the commit and version name were the same? I've re-run the tests on my localhost machine, but the generated report uses results from the previous run. If not, I'll re-run the tests with the dummy -rc4 tag.. Regards, Daniel Anton Vodonosov writes: > 15.02.201

Re: [rc2]

15.02.2016, 19:23, "Daniel Kochmański" : > *sigh*, I've run the tests only against -rc3 on the server and it lacks > some libraries and is too slow for some libraries to load > (timeouts). I'm re-running both 16.0.0 and 16.1.2-rc3 on my noisy > desktop machine :) > > Regards, > Daniel > > PS I've

Re: [rc2]

icates *xxx* :key #'lisp :test #'equalp) ; -- Daniel Kochmański writes: > OK, I've found the problem. I've added -rc2 suffix while forgetting to > merge with the develop branch (silly me), while manually checking with > my build from develop branch. > > Reg

Re: [rc2]

OK, I've found the problem. I've added -rc2 suffix while forgetting to merge with the develop branch (silly me), while manually checking with my build from develop branch. Regards, Daniel Anton Vodonosov writes: > 14.02.2016, 02:07, "Daniel Kochmański" : >>>

Re: [rc2]

14.02.2016, 02:07, "Daniel Kochmański" : >>  They are generated by these two calls: >>     >> https://github.com/cl-test-grid/cl-test-grid-work/blob/1211e0f191542f3bb1cde7b2de35db821067cbe4/ecl-reports4.lisp#L193 > > Sorry for bothering you. I'll generate next reports myself :-) No problem for me

Re: [rc2]

Hey, thank you for response. Anton Vodonosov writes: > 12.02.2016, 20:58, "Daniel Kochmański" : >> Hey, >> >> I've finished running cl-test-grid on the rc2 (I hope I've fixed the >> issue – it wasn't the RNG, but defsetf bug). >> >>

Re: [rc2]

12.02.2016, 20:58, "Daniel Kochmański" : > Hey, > > I've finished running cl-test-grid on the rc2 (I hope I've fixed the > issue – it wasn't the RNG, but defsetf bug). > > Could you Anton create reports based on these new tests? Thank you! > There

[rc2]

Hey, I've finished running cl-test-grid on the rc2 (I hope I've fixed the issue – it wasn't the RNG, but defsetf bug). Could you Anton create reports based on these new tests? Thank you! There is no rush with it of course. Best regards, Daniel -- Daniel Kochmański ;; aka jack