Hey, thank you for response.
Anton Vodonosov writes: > 12.02.2016, 20:58, "Daniel Kochmański" <dan...@turtleware.eu>: >> Hey, >> >> I've finished running cl-test-grid on the rc2 (I hope I've fixed the >> issue – it wasn't the RNG, but defsetf bug). >> >> Could you Anton create reports based on these new tests? Thank you! >> There is no rush with it of course. > > > Here they are: > > https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/ecl/ecl-diff-16.1.2-rc2-lin-x64-bytecode.html > > https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/ecl/ecl-diff-16.1.2-rc2-lin-x64-lisp-to-c.html Thanks. Weird, I've explicitly checked alexandria and there seems to be no failed tests on my machine. Maybe I had some cache leftovers? Or some other weird issue (like providing wrong path for the implementation). Not sure. Tested it right now with (asdf:test-system 'alexandria) to confirm that and I have "No tests failed". I'll rerun tests on Monday. > > They are generated by these two calls: > > https://github.com/cl-test-grid/cl-test-grid-work/blob/1211e0f191542f3bb1cde7b2de35db821067cbe4/ecl-reports4.lisp#L193 Sorry for bothering you. I'll generate next reports myself :-) > > > Also, whey I sent you reports for RC1, I made a mistake, they were both > generated > from bytecode compiler. Sorry about that: > > 08.02.2016, 13:22, "Anton Vodonosov" <avodono...@yandex.ru>: >> Here are the diff reports: >> >> https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/ecl/ecl-diff-16.1.2-lin-x64-lisp-to-c.html >> https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/ecl/ecl-diff-16.1.2-lin-x64-bytecode.html > > The fixed lisp-to-c diff for the previous RC: > > https://common-lisp.net/project/cl-test-grid/ecl/ecl-diff-16.1.2-lin-x64-lisp-to-c-fixed.html Np. Thanks once again. > > Best regards, > - Anton Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Kochmański ;; aka jackdaniel | Poznań, Poland TurtleWare - Daniel Kochmański | www.turtleware.eu "Be the change that you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi
