Re: [PATCH 4/4] rts5208: Fix usleep range is preferred over udelay

2019-06-21 Thread Lukas Schneider
Am 21.06.2019 um 13:04 schrieb Pavel Machek: On Wed 2019-06-19 17:46:48, Lukas Schneider wrote: This patch fixes the issue reported by checkpatch: CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Doucmentation/timers/timers-howto.txt It's save to sleep here instead of using busy waiting, be

Re: [PATCH 4/4] rts5208: Fix usleep range is preferred over udelay

2019-06-21 Thread Pavel Machek
On Wed 2019-06-19 17:46:48, Lukas Schneider wrote: > This patch fixes the issue reported by checkpatch: > > CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; > see Doucmentation/timers/timers-howto.txt > > It's save to sleep here instead of using busy waiting, > because we are not in an atomic contex

[PATCH 4/4] rts5208: Fix usleep range is preferred over udelay

2019-06-19 Thread Lukas Schneider
This patch fixes the issue reported by checkpatch: CHECK: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Doucmentation/timers/timers-howto.txt It's save to sleep here instead of using busy waiting, because we are not in an atomic context. Signed-off-by: Lukas Schneider Signed-off-by: Jannik Moritz