On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 11:39:30AM +, Dominik Kierner wrote:
> On 5/25/2022 21:46, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
...
> > Thanks, I looked at the code briefly and think that there are things there
> > that we
> > could use. I.e the 3-wire SPI support that's in
> > panel-solomon-ssd130x-spi
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 09:46:24PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> On 3/10/22 14:11, Dominik Kierner wrote:
...
> > # DRM Mode Configuration via Device Tree
> >
> > In the old fbdev driver, the display modes are hard-coded, which means
> > for every new display configuration, a new patc
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 09:32:26AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 18.10.22 um 17:52 schrieb Zack Rusin:
> IIRC PSB hardware is only available in 32-bit systems.
Dunno about deep details, but IIUC the Intel Tangier and Intel Annioedale
are 64-bit SoCs that have Imagination + Intel IPs, the l
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 04:39:23PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> From: Hector Martin
>
> %p4cc is designed for DRM/V4L2 FOURCCs with their specific quirks, but
> it's useful to be able to print generic 4-character codes formatted as
> an integer. Extend it to add format specifiers for printing gene
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 07:37:17PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 21 Feb 2025, at 8:59 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:37:13AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > First of all, I do not see the cover letter. Is it only an issue on my si
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 08:06:51PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
>
> > Does this look good now? Made orig a union.
>
> Wait, it's messier. Maybe declare data type of val separately in each case?
Yes, this sounds better.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 05:21:08PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 21 Feb 2025, at 9:21 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:36:00AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
...
> >> + for (x = 0; x < pixels; x++) {
> >> + pix = le32_t
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:18:16PM +0200, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 07:37:17PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > > On 21 Feb 2025, at 8:59 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:37:13AM +00
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 07:13:06PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:37:57AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
...
> >> +} __packed;
> >
> > Why __packed? Please explain and justify for all the data types that are
> > marked
> > with this attribute.
>
> Just following the origin
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:37:13AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> From: Hector Martin
First of all, I do not see the cover letter. Is it only an issue on my side?
> %p4cc is designed for DRM/V4L2 FOURCCs with their specific quirks, but
> it's useful to be able to print generic 4-character codes for
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:37:57AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> From: Kerem Karabay
>
> The Touch Bars found on x86 Macs support two USB configurations: one
> where the device presents itself as a HID keyboard and can display
> predefined sets of keys, and one where the operating system has full
>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:36:00AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> From: Kerem Karabay
>
> Add XRGB emulation helper for devices that only support BGR888.
...
> + for (x = 0; x < pixels; x++) {
> + pix = le32_to_cpu(sbuf32[x]);
> + /* write red-green-blue to output i
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:36:03AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 25 Feb 2025, at 4:03 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:09:42AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
...
> >> +static int appletbdrm_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> &
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 09:48:11AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 25.02.25 um 09:00 schrieb Aditya Garg:
> > > On 25 Feb 2025, at 1:22 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > > > Am 24.02.25 um 14:40 schrieb Aditya Garg:
...
> > > > +struct appletbdrm_device {
> > > > +struct device *dev;
> >
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 08:37:32AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 24.02.25 um 15:29 schrieb andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 01:38:32PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
...
> > > +static void drm_fb_xrgb_to_bgr888_line(void *dbuf
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:09:42AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> From: Kerem Karabay
>
> The Touch Bars found on x86 Macs support two USB configurations: one
> where the device presents itself as a HID keyboard and can display
> predefined sets of keys, and one where the operating system has full
>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 01:40:20PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> From: Kerem Karabay
>
> The Touch Bars found on x86 Macs support two USB configurations: one
> where the device presents itself as a HID keyboard and can display
> predefined sets of keys, and one where the operating system has full
>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:18:48AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
>
>
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 3:28 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 03:46:03PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>>> On 20 Feb 2025, at 10:09 PM, Aditya Garg
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 01:38:32PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> From: Kerem Karabay
>
> Add XRGB emulation helper for devices that only support BGR888.
...
> +static void drm_fb_xrgb_to_bgr888_line(void *dbuf, const void *sbuf,
> unsigned int pixels)
Okay the xrgb is the actual pix
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:32:37PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 7:30 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 01:40:20PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
...
> >> +#define __APPLETBDRM_MSG_STR4(str4) ((__le32 __force)((str4[0] &
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:54:07PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> This conversion helper mimics the existing drm_fb_xrgb_to_rgb888 helper
Not really. See below.
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 7:59 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 01:38:32PM +00
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 05:00:50PM +0200, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:54:07PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > This conversion helper mimics the existing drm_fb_xrgb_to_rgb888 helper
>
> Not really. See below.
>
> > >
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:03:40PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 8:27 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:32:37PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>> On 24 Feb 2025, at 7:30 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wro
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:20:13PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 8:41 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:03:40PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>>> On 24 Feb 2025, at 8:27 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:32:56PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 8:50 PM, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >> On 24 Feb 2025, at 8:41 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:03:40PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >&
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:39:56PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 9:07 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:20:13PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>>> On 24 Feb 2025, at 8:41 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:40:29PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 9:08 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:32:56PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>> On 24 Feb 2025, at 8:50 PM, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:52:03PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 9:19 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:39:56PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>>> On 24 Feb 2025, at 9:07 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:56:36PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 9:23 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 03:40:29PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>>> On 24 Feb 2025, at 9:08 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 09:41:43AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 22.02.25 um 10:07 schrieb Aditya Garg:
...
> > > What padding, please? Why TCP UAPI headers do not have these attributes?
> > > Think about it, and think about what actually __packed does and how it
> > > affects
> > > (badl
On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 03:46:03PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 20 Feb 2025, at 10:09 PM, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >
> > %p4cc is designed for DRM/V4L2 FOURCCs with their specific quirks, but
> > it's useful to be able to print generic 4-character codes formatted as
> > an integer. Extend it to a
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:43:54AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 4:11 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:32:27AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>>> On 24 Feb 2025, at 3:54 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com w
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 11:20:12AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
>
> >
> > It would be nice to see the difference in the code generation for the all
> > __packed vs. only those that require it.
> >
> >> At least it's clear then
> >> what happens. And if your hardware requires this, you can't do much
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 11:57:47AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 5:13 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 11:20:12AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>
> >>> It would be nice to see the difference i
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 06:39:15AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 22 Feb 2025, at 5:41 PM, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >> On 21 Feb 2025, at 8:57 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 04:39:23PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
...
> >
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:19:13AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 21.02.25 um 16:51 schrieb andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 11:36:00AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
...
> > > + for (x = 0; x < pixels; x++) {
> > > +
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:32:27AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 24 Feb 2025, at 3:54 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:18:48AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>>> On 24 Feb 2025, at 3:28 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com w
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 03:16:28PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > Looking at the header files, it looks like doing cpu_to_le32 on that
> > variable and doing le32_to_cpu will actually reverse the order twice, on
> > big endian systems, thus technically all way would not swap the order at
> > all
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:53:15PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 25.02.25 um 14:27 schrieb andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:59:43PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> > > Am 25.02.25 um 12:01 schrieb andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com:
>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:48:53AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 25 Feb 2025, at 4:17 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:36:03AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> >>>> On 25 Feb 2025, at 4:03 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:58:17PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 25.02.25 um 11:33 schrieb andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:09:42AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
...
> > > +static int appletbdrm_probe(struct u
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:59:43PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 25.02.25 um 12:01 schrieb andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 10:48:53AM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > > > On 25 Feb 2025, at 4:17 PM, andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
&
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 05:28:33PM +, Aditya Garg wrote:
> > On 27 Feb 2025, at 10:24 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Hi Aditya,
> >
> > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> >
> > [auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
> > [also build test WARNING on v6.14-rc4 next-
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 12:51:33PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 12.03.25 um 10:06 schrieb Aditya Garg:
...
> If you want to print out protocol-header tokens, why not use formatting
> macros as we do with DRM mode? There's one for the format string [1] and one
> for the argument. [2] It's
44 matches
Mail list logo
